Fourth Circuit Revives Rosetta Stone’s Claims Against Google Over its AdWords Program


In a closely-watched battle, the Fourth Circuit brought life back into Rosetta Stone’s trademark infringement and dilution claims against Google stemming from its AdWords program. In 2010, the Eastern District of Virginia ruled overwhelmingly in favor of Google on summary judgment finding that it did not infringe Rosetta Stone’s trademark or dilute the value of its marks by allowing others to purchase the “ROSETTA STONE” mark in its AdWords Program. On Monday, April 9, 2012, the Fourth Circuit vacated the district court’s order with respect to direct trademark infringement, contributory infringement and dilution claims. Although the Fourth Circuit has resuscitated Rosetta Stone’s claims against Google, the battle is far from over. The case is now remanded to the trial court for further proceedings where the parties will continue to wage war over keyword advertising...

Google’s AdWords Accused of Trademark Infringement

Google’s AdWords program allows advertisers to purchase “keywords” that launch the advertiser’s ads when the keyword is entered as a search term in Google. In 2004, Google changed its AdWords policy to allow the use of trademarks as search triggers even over the objection of the trademark owner. Later Google introduced a tool that suggested relevant trademarks for advertisers to bid on as keywords. In 2009, Google loosened its policy further by permitting limited use of trademarks in the title or text of advertisements for resellers of trademarked products, makers or sellers of component parts for trademark products, sellers of compatible goods for use with a trademarked product or reviewers of trademarked products.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Venable LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »