Fourth Circuit Says Co-Worker's Use of Racially Derogative Terms Did Not Create Hostile Work Environment

more+
less-

Not every offensive act in the workplace constitutes actionable harassment under Title VII. In order to rise to the level of a hostile and offensive working environment, the conduct must be sufficiently severe and pervasive to alter the conditions of the victim’s employment, and create an abusive working environment. Last week, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals (which includes North Carolina and South Carolina) determined that a co-worker’s use of a racially derogative term twice over a two-day period did not rise to this level.
 
In Boyer-Liberto v. Fontainebleau Corp., the plaintiff was an African-American employee working in the hotel restaurant. She alleged that during a dispute over work issues, a co-worker called her a “porch monkey” on consecutive days. The plaintiff complained about this conduct to human resources, but was terminated shortly thereafter for performance problems. She sued, claiming racial harassment and retaliation under Title VII.
 
The Fourth Circuit affirmed dismissal of the claim on summary judgment. While noting that the alleged racial slur was offensive and unjustifiable, the court said that as a matter of law, use of this term by a co-worker on two consecutive days could not create a hostile work environment. The alleged conduct was singular and isolated, and the plaintiff made no additional claims of racially-based harassment. The court distinguished this situation from cases where harassment was found based on use of racial slurs after more incidents over a greater period of time.
 
This decision might have been different if the racial slurs had been made by a supervisor. Courts view such conduct by supervisors as having a more direct impact on the victim’s employment. Even if isolated or occasional use of these terms may not constitute legal harassment, employers should treat such incidents as serious violations of their anti-harassment policies. As noted by the Fourth Circuit, if these early actions are repeated over time, they eventually can rise to the level of actionable harassment.

 

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×