Fox Can't Maintain Action on Ads It Has No Copyright


Fox Broadcasting Company can’t maintain a copyright action against Dish Network’s product that enables Dish customers to skip over commercials because Fox doesn’t own the copyright to the commercials, an appellate court found in affirming a trial court ruling.

In addition, the appellate court said, while it is a “much closer” question, the trial court did not err in finding that the commercial-skipping product did not violate the contract between Fox and Dish, which prohibits Dish from offering a “video-on-demand” program.

At issue are two Dish offerings—“Hopper” and “Joey.” Both allow Dish customers to view prerecorded Fox programs and automatically skip over the commercials. If a Dish customer enables the feature, the viewer sees only the first and last few seconds of each commercial break. Fox sued Dish for copyright infringement and breach of contract and sought a preliminary injunction. The trial court denied the injunction and the appellate court affirmed the trial court’s decision.

Both the trial court and the appellate court found that the recording of the programs is air use under the Copyright Act. The appellate court noted further noted that “commercial-skipping does not implicate Fox’s copyright interest because Fox owns the copyrights to the television programs, not to the ads aired in the commercial breaks,” the appellate court wrote. “If recording an entire copyrighted program is a fair use, the fact that viewers do not watch the ads not copyrighted by Fox cannot transform the recording into a copyright violation.”

The contract between Fox and Dish prohibits Dish from distributing Fox programming “on an interactive, time-delayed, video-on-demand or similar basis.” The appellate court noted it was “dubious of Dish’s position” that the products are “not ‘similar’ to ‘interactive, time-delayed, [or] video-on-demand’ programming, the distribution of which is expressly prohibited” by the contract. However, the appellate court would not reverse the trial court’s ruling that the product was “more akin” to a DVR than to video on demand.

Fox Broadcasting Company, et al. v. Dish Network, LLC, et al., Ninth Circuit No. 12-57048, issued July 24, 2013.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Balough Law Offices, LLC | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Balough Law Offices, LLC on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.