GAO Calls For Consistency Among Medicare Contractors Postpayment Claims Review


The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently published the results of a study examining the effectiveness of CMS’s contractors that conduct postpayment claims reviews to identify improper payments (i.e., Medicare Administrative Contractors, Zone Program Integrity Contractors, Recovery Auditors, and Comprehensive Error Rate Testing contractors).  In its report, the GAO assesses the extent to which requirements, methods, and standards applied during postpayment claims reviews differ across contractors.  Although postpayment claims reviews involve similar processes regardless of which type of contractor conducts them, CMS has different requirements for many aspects of the process across the four contractor types.  For example, there are differences in time frames for providers to send in documentation, content of communications to providers about the reviews, reviewer staffing, and the designation of criteria used to determine whether a service is paid improperly.  Providers indicated that some differences hindered their understanding of and compliance with the claims review process.  The GAO set out to determine whether these differences, if any, could impede effective and efficient claims reviews.

GAO recommends, among other things, that CMS do the following in order to increase consistency across Medicare contractors:

  • Examine all contractor postpayment review requirements to determine those that could be made more consistent;
  • Communicate its findings and time frame for taking action; and
  • Reduce differences where it can be done without impeding efforts to reduce improper payments.

The Department of Health and Human Services noted that CMS had begun examining requirements for streamlining postpayment reviews across the various contractors and otherwise concurred with GAO’s recommendations to reduce differences in postpayment review requirements.

CMS estimated that $32.4 billion in Medicare fee-for-service payments in FY 2012 were improper. GAO’s July 23, 2013 report is available here. See also K&S’s Health Headlines article discussing CMS’s announcement of Unified Program Integrity Contractors, available here

Reporter, Juliet M. McBride, Houston, +1 713 276 7448,

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.