Genetic Marker Map of Sunflower Species Reported

by McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
Contact

[author: Kevin E. Noonan]

SunflowerLong before DNA sequencing technology existed (indeed, long before Watson and Crick proposed that DNA was the genetic material and proposed a structural basis for its ability to be replicated), scientists were able to study genome structure using strictly genetic approaches.  Genetic linkage maps, for example, date from the work of Thomas Hunt Morgan and Hermann Mueller on fruit flies at Columbia University and later at Cal Tech.  Traditionally, these maps have been generated using phenotypic markers, much like Mendel did with his pea plants (in relative obscurity) a generation before.

Marker density is a limitation using traditional methods, however.  But an improvement in this aspect of the methodology was achieved in the 1980's with the advent of restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) methods.  These methods used physical changes in DNA sequence (specifically at restriction enzyme recognition sites) to greatly expand the scope of linkage analysis.  This is because the "phenotype" of a RFLP is a polymorphism that can be identified using electrophorectic separation of fragments having different lengths; unlike traditional phenotypes, unless the RFLP happens to be associated with an amino acid change in a protein it is unlikely to be subject to natural selection, and thus will fall within the "neutral" sequence variation that has been appreciated to exist in natural populations since the work of Motoo Kimura in the 1960's.  The RFLP method was used to great effectiveness by David Botstein, Ray White, Mark Skolnick, and Ronald Davis in identifying the chromosomal location of genes associated with, inter alia, Huntington's disease, and notably by Mary Claire King in identifying the locus of the BRCA1 gene and in forensic studies used to identify Argentines "disappeared" by the military dictatorship during the co-called "dirty war."

CoverSince the completion of the Human Genome Project, the existence of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), which are RFLPs without being limited to restriction enzyme recognition sites, has expanded the extent and number of generic markers useful for genome mapping.  These SNPs have been used to construct a high-density linkage map for the sunflower (Helianthus annus) in a paper by John E. Bowers, Eleni Bachlava, Robert L. Brunick, Loren H. Rieseberg, Steven J. Knapp and John M. Burke from the Department of Plant Biology and Center for Applied Genetic Technologies, University of Georgia, the Department of Crop and Soil Science, Oregon State University, the Department of Botany, University of British Columbia, and the Department of Biology, Indiana University.  The study, "Development of a 10,000 Locus Genetic Map of the Sunflower Genome Based on Multiple Crosses" was reported in the online journal Genes/Genomes/Genetics (G3), 2: 721-729 (July 1, 2012).  These researchers identified 10,080 polymorphic genetic loci in the approximately 3.5 Gbp sunflower genome using a high throughput SNP genotyping array in developing their map, but also noted areas of the sunflower genome (up to 26 centiMorgans in size) having no markers that could be detected in individual cross, the result, the authors speculate, of genetic identity between individuals in the four populations studied.  However, none of these regions were in common in the four populations as a whole, permitting a "gapless" map of the sunflower genome to be elucidated.

Interestingly, the economic importance of sunflowers (being the fourth largest source of cultivated vegetable oils worldwide; www.fas.usda.gov) is such that earlier genomic mapping technologies have been applied (including RFLP maps; Berry et al. 1995, "Molecular marker analysis of Helianthus-annuus L. 2. Construction of an RFLP linkage map for cultivated sunflower," Theor. Appl. Genet. 91: 195–99; Gentzbittel et al. 1995, "Development of a consensus linkage RFLP map of cultivated sunflower (Helianthus-annuus L)," Theor. Appl. Genet. 90: 1079–108) and others.  These efforts, however, have been directed towards "traits of agronomic importance" as well as comparisons with genomic structure of related Helianthus species according to the authors.  But these traditional efforts suffered from the same limited marker density deficiencies noted earlier (although SNPs and other markers identified using these methodologies were integrated into the high-density map).  Compared with the marker density in these earlier studies (one marker per 2 Mbps) other species (Arabidopsis, rice, sorghum) were previously mapped at a density of ~160 bp per marker (i.e., a ~12,500-fold higher marker density).  These efforts were also hampered by the fact that no plant species closely related to sunflower (family Asteraceae) have been fully sequenced (the closest sequenced relative is the potato), although other related species (tomato, lettuce) are currently subject to genomic sequencing efforts.

Markers were analyzed from multiple genetic crosses between members of the four populations.  The study reports crosses between individuals from an oilseed maintainer line with high oleic acid content and an oilseed "restorer" line, while other crosses involved individuals from the oilseed maintainer line and a wild sunflower line; an oilseed restorer line and a confectionery restorer line; and an oilseed restorer line that segregates for nuclear male sterility and a non-oilseed landrace line.  From these four populations, four individual maps of ~3500-5500 marker loci were created, falling into 17 linkage groups which was consistent with the 17 chromosomes in the sunflower species (although crosses with the landrace species showed genetic heterogeneity that required additional analysis).  Analyses of genotyping errors showed that the "raw allele calls" made from the data were "highly robust" (i.e., having an error rate ranging from ~0.14-1%).  Turning to these results, the authors report that the maps were "largely collinear with an average of 88.7% of all shared loci being syntenic in pairwise combinations."  "Not surprisingly," according to the study, "the cross that showed the most and largest regions of reduced recombination was the only cross that involved wild sunflower," a phenomenon that had been previously seen in maize (McMullen et al. 2009, "Genetic properties of the maize nested association mapping population," Science 325: 737–40).  The study also reports that 762 of the 5694 mapped loci could be ascribed to two different chromosomal locations in different crosses (and 21 markers were found at three genomic locations), a phenomenon the authors suggest could be due to the existence of multicopy genes, wherein the mapped markers were the result of detecting the different paralogs that were located at different loci in the sunflower genome.  This corresponded to <14% of all detected SNPs being associated with multicopy genes.

The combined consensus map reported in this paper comprised 10,080 loci spanning 1380 cM.  The authors state that the existence of this SNP map represented "over 5 million molecular data points" made possible by using multiple mapping populations simultaneously and that can be used to help assemble a map from the "sunflower genome project" currently underway (Kane et al. 2011, "Progress towards a reference genome for sunflower," Botany-Botanique 89: 429–37).  The relevance and utility of this marker map for understanding and improving sunflower species, subspecies and economically important variants remains a task for the future.

FIG1
FIG2

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP
Contact
more
less

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.