Give And Take: Lofgren’s Twin Trade Secret Bills Would Curtail Actions Under One Law, Expand Them Under Another

by Orrick - Trade Secrets Group
Contact

When Rep. Zoe Lofgren, the Silicon Valley Democrat, introduced a pair of bills last month on trade secret misappropriation, we puzzled over her purpose.  Was this a response to the White House’s call for improved federal legislation to protect U.S. trade secrets?  Did the measures mark the start of a comprehensive federal civil “Trade Secrets Act” that would put trade secrets on par with other federally protected intellectual property such as patents, trademarks, and copyrights?

Trade Secrets Watch decided to investigate and tapped our congressional sources for the back story.  Turns out our musings were wrong.

First, a quick backgrounder on federal trade secret protection (and lack thereof): The federal government has declined to go all-in on protecting U.S. trade secrets, leaving this area primarily governed by state law.  When it comes to trade secrets, federal law consists of a patchwork of acts that leave yawning gaps in legal protection.  For example, the federal Economic Espionage Act, known as the EEA, prohibits trade secret theft but is solely a criminal law — it doesn’t provide for a federal civil cause of action (i.e., a right allowing private parties to sue).  And the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, known as the CFAA, only covers certain types of thefts involving unauthorized access to computers.  It provides for criminal prosecution and grants a victimized company the right to sue.  But in a case last year (United States v. Nosal), the Ninth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals interpreted the CFAA narrowly, finding that it was primarily intended to curtail hacking and that it does not bar employees from stealing trade secrets from their employers’ computers in more run-of-the-mill cases of trade secret theft.  The court reasoned that the CFAA’s prohibitions against accessing a computer “without authorization” or by “exceeding authorized access” don’t apply to employees who steal from their workplace computer systems, as long as they are using their work login credentials and don’t engage in hacking to gain access.  The Nosal decision ignited some controversy because it created a split among federal appeals courts: other courts had held that these CFAA provisions do ban “insider” trade secret theft by employees, even those sitting at company computers with authorization.  The Fourth Circuit and a number of district courts have since joined the Ninth Circuit in reading the CFAA more narrowly.

On June 20, 2013, Lofgren introduced two bills: (1) Aaron’s Law Act of 2013, and (2) the Private Right of Action Against Theft of Trade Secrets Act of 2013.  The first bill, Aaron’s Law, would amend the CFAA to basically make the Nosal decision the law of the land.  It would specify that the CFAA’s prohibition against someone cyber-thieving by accessing a computer without authorization or in excess of authorization should only apply where he circumvents a technological barrier to gain access, i.e. engages in some type of hacking.  Lofgren’s concern is that the current CFAA makes it a federal crime to access a computer without authorization or in a way that exceeds authorization—but that this is too vague because Congress has never defined what that means.  As a result, some prosecutors have taken the view that a person who merely violates a website’s terms of service or an employment agreement should face jail time.  The cases of Lori Drew and Andrew Auernheimer are examples.  Any number of activities on the Internet could qualify as breaching a site’s terms of service or an employment agreement, even checking personal email on a work computer.  Aaron’s Law seeks to ensure that the CFAA will only be used to prosecute hackers and not people engaging in ordinary Internet activity.  The bill is named for Aaron Swartz, an Internet activist who committed suicide as he faced criminal prosecution under the CFAA.

Lofgren’s second bill would create a civil cause of action for trade secret theft under the Economic Espionage Act.  But why were these bills introduced on the same day?  What is the connection between them?  Here’s what Trade Secrets Watch learned from our congressional sources.

It turns out that in her discussions with constituents, Lofgren heard that some stakeholders didn’t want her CFAA amendments to deprive them of the right to sue for trade secret theft that they believe they presently have in courts that don’t follow the Nosal line of cases.  In a nutshell, Lofgren would remove the right under the CFAA to prosecute and sue employees who steal trade secrets by accessing work computers without or in excess of their authorization (unless they engage in hacking), but she would “replace” it with a right to sue under the EEA.

In some ways, Lofgren’s bill would provide for a broader civil federal trade secret remedy than under the current regime because the EEA prohibits more types of misappropriation than the CFAA’s bans on hacking and accessing computers without authorization.  At the same time, an EEA federal cause of action won’t necessarily satisfy all the trade secret groupies out there who were hoping for a comprehensive federal “Trade Secrets Act” that would provide A to Z protection of U.S. trade secrets.  Among other things, the EEA doesn’t pre-empt state law and doesn’t provide the full panoply of remedies that state law does.

It does not appear these bills will drive sweeping federal trade secret reform—but then again, they’re not intended to.  While Lofgren says she is open to discussion of why such reform is needed, she seems to have proposed these companion measures primarily to increase the chances that Aaron’s Law will pass.  If Aaron’s Law can pass on its own, or dies for whatever reason, there may be less incentive to push for a broad trade secret right of action.

 

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick - Trade Secrets Group | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Orrick - Trade Secrets Group
Contact
more
less

Orrick - Trade Secrets Group on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!