Goldman Sachs' Conflicts at Center of Kinder-El Paso Deal

more+
less-
March 28 (Bloomberg Law) -- John Reed, partner in the corporate and litigations groups at DLA Piper, talks with Bloomberg Law's Lee Pacchia about a recent decision in Delaware Chancery Court that investment banking firm Goldman Sachs had an 'incomplete and inadequate handling of a conflict of interest' in it's representation of natural gas pipeline operate El Paso in its sale to rival Kinder Morgan. Goldman Sachs stood to gain a fee of $20 million for representing El Paso and also held a $4 billion stake in purchaser, Kinder Morgan. See more +
March 28 (Bloomberg Law) -- John Reed, partner in the corporate and litigations groups at DLA Piper, talks with Bloomberg Law's Lee Pacchia about a recent decision in Delaware Chancery Court that investment banking firm Goldman Sachs had an 'incomplete and inadequate handling of a conflict of interest' in it's representation of natural gas pipeline operate El Paso in its sale to rival Kinder Morgan. Goldman Sachs stood to gain a fee of $20 million for representing El Paso and also held a $4 billion stake in purchaser, Kinder Morgan. Goldman's conflict begs the question; how should investment banks handle conflicts of interest? See less -

Embed Video

Copy

Published In: Administrative Agency Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Energy & Utilities Updates, Finance & Banking Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bloomberg Law | Attorney Advertising