Green Chemistry And Trade Secrets: California Leads Chemical Disclosure Movement, As Companies Wrestle With Options For Protection

by Orrick - Trade Secrets Group
Contact

http://blogs.orrick.com/trade-secrets-watch/files/2014/02/14Feb14-Resized-200x150.jpgEarlier this year, we picked mandatory public disclosure laws as a trend to watch in 2014.  Developments in California seem to bear that out, and trade secrets owners will want to keep a close eye on the green chemistry movement and expanded public disclosure requirements for manufacturers of a wide range of consumer products.  Companies that make or sell products in California — ranging from electronics and household cleaners to children’s toys and cosmetics — will need to map out a plan that complies with the new requirements while at the same time protecting their valuable intellectual property, including trade secrets.

California’s Safer Consumer Product Regulations

On October 1, 2013, California’s Safer Consumer Product (SCP) regulations  became effective.  The regulations brand roughly 1,200 chemicals as “chemicals of concern,” meaning that manufacturers of products produced or sold in California must disclose whether their products contain these chemicals.  By April 2014, California will select up to five “priority products” for which manufacturers will be required to seek safer alternatives.

Almost by definition, mandatory public disclosure laws create a problem for owners of trade secrets.  To address this dilemma, the SCP regulations carved out some exceptions to the disclosure rules that would protect certain trade secrets from disclosure, subject to an approval process.  Manufacturers would be able to avoid disclosure of anything the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) determines to be a trade secret.  The specifics of the process for trade secret approval are still under consideration, but for the time being, the best strategy for trade secrets owners is to make sure they explicitly claim and request DTSC review of any and all trade secrets and be prepared to back up their trade secrets claims with concrete evidence.

Last year, California’s Office of Administrative Law (OAL) rejected the trade secret provisions of the SCP regulations.  The OAL is responsible for reviewing administrative regulations proposed by state agencies for compliance with California’s Administrative Procedure Act (APA).  The OAL found that the trade secret provisions lacked sufficient clarity as to: (1) what “substantive criteria” that DTSC will apply in determining whether materials as trade secrets, and (2) whether the regulations vested the DTSC with the discretion to decline to make such a determination altogether.  The DTSC proposed revisions to the regulations to address these concerns (calling for use of the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act as the applicable criteria and making DTSC review mandatory).  These revisions have been incorporated into the final regulations that went into effect in October 2013.

Manufacturers should be mindful of the following key elements of the SCP regulations:

  • The DTSC must review a trade secret claim and substantiating information before it discloses any information designated as trade secret;
  • If DTSC determines that a trade secret claim does not meet regulation requirements, the agency must notify the submitter that the information will be made subject to public disclosure thirty (30) days after the notification; and
  • During that 30-day window, the submitter may file a lawsuit for a preliminary injunction and/or declaratory relief to protect that information from disclosure (or risk waiving that right).

Companies making or selling products in California will want to carefully evaluate and safeguard their trade secrets and confidential business information as part of the SCP compliance process.  Failure to do so might lead to a waiver of the confidentiality or trade secret status of their information as it would become publicly available to any interested parties (including watchdog groups, government agencies, or rival companies).

The DTSC submission process allows for redactions as necessary to protect confidential intellectual property.  But public disclosure of even a redacted version might jeopardize trade secret protection by offering clues to competitors about the nature of particular trade secrets.  Companies will want to engage in strategic and careful redaction to maintain trade secret protection and confidentiality and — as might become necessary — to preserve a record of their reasonable efforts to protect the secrecy of the information.

In determining trade secret status, the SCP regulations rely on the substance of the California Uniform Trade Secret Act (Civil Code §§ 3426 et seq.), and the public disclosure limits identified in the Government Code (§ 6254.7).  And while the facts of each situation will vary greatly from product to product, one key takeaway for companies is that they must be ready to respond quickly if the DTSC rejects their trade secret claims.  Judicial intervention within thirty (30) days of the DTSC’s final determination is the only recourse for a party whose trade secret claim is denied.

California Safe Cosmetics Act

A related problem has arisen in connection with a new California state website that allows consumers to find out what chemicals are contained in their cosmetics products.  A number of companies objected that certain information should not be disclosed on the website because it constitutes their trade secrets.  The companies’ withholding of this information has sparked criticism and public debate.

On January 10, 2014, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) rolled out a searchable online database that allows the public to learn more about possible risks associated with the cosmetic products they use.  The California Safe Cosmetics Act requires companies that manufacture cosmetics to report any cosmetics products that contain ingredients known or suspected to cause cancer, birth defects, or other reproductive harm.  The California Safe Cosmetics Program (CSCP) collects this data and makes it available to the public via a website that allows consumers to search by product category, product name, or brand/company name.

The act requires companies to report to the CSCP if their products are sold in California and the company has more than $1 million per year in cosmetic sales.  Reporting is required regardless of the amount of the reportable chemical in the product.  The CSCP points out that just because a product is included in the reporting database does not necessarily mean the product has been shown to cause harm.  As a way to facilitate compliance, the CSCP maintains this list of chemicals to be disclosed.

Just like the Safer Consumer Product Regulations, the Safe Cosmetics Act creates a dilemma for companies that want to protect their trade secrets while ensuring compliance with the law.  One strategy that companies appear to be using is to list “Trade Secret” as an ingredient in their products (in some cases, the only ingredient, but in others as one ingredient along with others).  As of February 7, 2014, “Trade Secret” was listed as an ingredient in 1,445 products.

According to the CSCP website:

“Trade secret information, including ingredients exempt from disclosure on cosmetics labels, is   not exempt from CA Safe Cosmetics Program reporting requirements. However, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH) cannot make any confidential and/or trade secret information available to the public unless the outcome of a CDPH investigation deems the information is not confidential and/or a trade secret.”

According to the CSCP submission guidelines, companies that claim information as confidential and/or a trade secret on the online reporting forms must also submit supporting written documentation to justify this designation.  (Note that the FDA has its own process for seeking exemption from disclosure requirements on the basis of trade secret status.)

*   *   *

California is not alone in its interest in using public disclosure laws to promote green chemistry and restrict the use of potentially harmful chemicals.  At least 33 states are considering new regulations of toxic chemicals in products.  As other states enter the fray, the regulatory regime could get a lot more complicated and result in a patchwork of complex regulations that differ from state to state, much like we have seen in the fracking area.

One thing is for sure: these two recent developments in California underscore the need for companies to ensure that they are protecting their trade secrets when complying with mandatory public disclosure laws.  Even though these laws carve out exceptions for trade secrets, there is always a risk that a government agency might reject a company’s trade secret claim.  Companies in this area will be well-served to stay on top of these regulations in order to protect their secret business information, or consider alternatives to trade secret protection as a way to maintain their competitive edge.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Orrick - Trade Secrets Group | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Orrick - Trade Secrets Group
Contact
more
less

Orrick - Trade Secrets Group on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!