Gross Negligence The Focus Of BP Oil Spill Post-Trial Briefing Order


Gross negligence is a focus of post-trial briefing orders in the BP oil spill litigation.

After weeks of testimony, and dramatic “reveals” of newly discovered evidence that had been hiding in labs for years, the Phase One trial of the BP litigation finally came to an end late last month. Now the parties must submit their briefs and make their final arguments to the court by June 21, 2013.

At the conclusion of trial last month, Judge Barbier issued the post-trial briefing order, setting forth the usual information, such as page limits and deadlines for filing briefs and responses. However, he also provided some suggested topics of discussion for the parties to address in their briefs. Although not required, the court “believes it would be helpful” if the parties addressed these issues.

What is interesting, and perhaps telling, is the focus on gross negligence in proposed topics of discussion. The court would like for the parties to discuss, among other issues, the standards for finding “gross negligence” or “willful misconduct” under the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. § 1321 (“CWA”), and the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, 33 U.S.C. §2704 (“OPA”); the standard for a finding of punitive damages under general maritime law, and how it may differ from the CWA or OPA; whether an act or omission that is not itself causal of the accident can still be considered in determining whether a party engaged in conduct constituting gross negligence; and whether compliance with applicable regulations preclude a finding of gross negligence, regardless of whether a defendant knew or should have known that its conduct or equipment was unsafe.

Gross negligence is particularly important in this litigation to the defendants, for a number of reasons. OPA provides for certain limits on liability depending on whether the instrumentality from which the oil is discharged is a “vessel” or an “offshore facility.” 33 U.S.C. § 2704(a)-(b). What could be detrimental for the defendants here is, if the incident was proximately caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the responsible party, the limits of liability are not available. 33 U.S.C. § 2704(c). Under the CWA, the civil penalties are greater if the violation was caused by the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the owner, operator, or person in charge. 33 U.S.C. § 1321(b)(7)(D). Gross negligence should also play a part in a punitive damages analysis, which the court has already held may be available in this litigation. In Complaint of Merry Shipping, 650 F.2d 626 (5th Cir. 1981).

Although we don’t know how the judge will ultimately rule, gross negligence of one or more of the responsible parties certainly is at issue. The damages in this litigation will be very high, and the exposure for the responsible parties increases exponentially if the court finds gross negligence or willful misconduct. Briefing should be completed by July 12, 2013, and everyone in the Gulf South will be waiting on pins and needles to see not only how the court handles this complex trial, but the sums of money that will be awarded as a result of this tragic incident.

Disclosure: King, Krebs & Jurgens represents a number of private and public claimants in the BP litigation.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King, Krebs & Jurgens, PLLC | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.