In This Issue:
- Except from Cases:
Australia. Family Court -
Re: Jamie  FamCAFC 110 -
The child concerned, "Jamie", was born male but later diagnosed with childhood gender identity disorder. At first instance, Jamie's parents sought the Court's consent for her to undertake a two stage special medical procedure involving the administration of puberty-suppressant hormones (stage one) and oestrogen (stage two). The judge allowed stage one treatment but felt it premature to make a decision on stage two.
The point of law requiring determination on appeal was whether treatment for childhood gender identity is a special medical procedure that triggers the Court's welfare jurisdiction under the Family Law Act 1975 (Cth), thereby requiring its consent to be administered and removing parental responsibility over the decision.
The Court determined that stage one treatment is therapeutic rather than a special medical procedure and therefore lies within the field of parental responsibility. As it is a psychological disease, not physiological, the treatment is reversible and does not carry a serious risk if the incorrect decision is made. Consequently, should the treating medical practitioner, child and parents be in agreement as to the treatment, court authorisation is not required....
Please see full Update below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.