Health Care Reform Implementation Update - November 5, 2013

by Cozen O'Connor
Contact

Criticism of the Affordable Care Act’s exchange rollout continued this past week. The main line of attack has moved from the malfunctioning website to canceled plans despite President Obama’s repeated promise that those who liked their health plans could keep them. The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Kathleen Sebelius, and the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Marilyn Tavenner, testified before congressional committees this week and apologized for the problems in the rollout. Administrator Tavenner testified again this morning before the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee. Also in the past week, the Senate Committee on Finance and the House Committee on Ways and Means introduced a joint legislative framework to replace the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) physician payment formula, adopting much of what the House Committee on Energy and Commerce suggested this summer

ON THE HILL

On October 30, the Senate Committee on Finance and the House Committee on Ways and Means introduced a joint legislative framework to replace the Sustainable Growth Rate (SGR) physician payment formula that determines how Medicare pays physicians. The proposal adopts many features of H.R. 2810, the Medicare Patient Access and Quality Improvement Act of 2013, that cleared the House Energy and Commerce Committee with bipartisan support this summer. The key difference between the new proposal from Finance and Ways and Means and the one from Energy and Commerce is that the Ways and Means/Finance proposal would freeze guaranteed annual physician payment updates for 10 years, whereas the Energy and Commerce measure would allow annual increases of 0.5 percent over five years. The discussion draft is now being circulated for comment until November 12.  On October 31, House Energy & Commerce leaders said they support the Finance/Ways and Means proposal.

On October 30, HHS Secretary Sebelius testified at a House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing. She apologized for the website’s malfunctioning and explained a Verizon Terremark network failure that impacted HealthCare.gov on October 28. In response to a question about costs of the website, Sec. Sebelius said $118 million had been spent on the website itself and about $56 million had been spent on additional information technology to support it. When asked about enrollment numbers, Sec. Sebelius said HealthCare.gov’s problems made reliable enrollment numbers impossible to determine at this point.

On October 30, CMS Administrator Marilyn Tavenner appeared before the House Ways and Means Committee. Administrator Tavenner apologized for HealthCare.gov’s problems and told the committee that CMS did not know about the problems until the first week of the website’s launch. Tavenner was asked repeatedly about enrollment numbers, but she did not provide the requested information and continued to say that enrollment data would not be available until mid-November. Chairman Dave Camp (R-Mich.) said that, “We now know the administration was not ready. Frankly, three years should have been enough.”  Administrator Tavenner testified again on November 5 before the Senate HELP Committee.

On October 30, Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.) said that she would propose legislation to ensure all Americans could keep their existing insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Sen. Landrieu faces a tough election as a Democrat in Louisiana in 2014. Similarly, in the House, Chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee Congressman Fred Upton (R-Mich.) is introducing the “Keep Your Health Plan Act,” which would allow any insurance plans that were in effect on January 1, 2013 to continue into 2014.

The Congressional Budget Office updated its analysis of an option to raise the eligibility age for Medicare from 65 to 67.  The updated report shows that the age increase would save $19 billion over 10 years, a number that is significantly lower than its 2012 estimate of $113 billion.

House Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) has been requesting documents from various entities. He subpoenaed documents from ACA contractor Quality Software Service, Inc. (QSSI), obtained a memo issued days before HealthCare.gov’s launch that reveals knowledge of security concerns and subpoenaed HHS for documents on the “technical problems” with the websites, user capacity of the site, testing information, and number of people who have enrolled or attempted to enroll on the exchanges.

Guidance on October 29 from the House’s chief administrative officer gave members of Congress until the end of the day on October 31 to decide whether their staffs would enter the DC insurance exchange. The guidance said lawmakers could designate their personal office aides as “official,” which would require them to enter the DC exchanges, or not official, which would mean they do not need to go on the exchanges. Sen. David Vitter (R-La.) proposed legislation that would require Congress to make public which of their staff members are enrolling in the insurance exchanges and which are not. In the meantime though, most of these decisions are being made privately within personal offices on Capitol Hill.

On October 30, Reps. Charles Boustany (R-La.) and Ami Bera (D-Calif.) proposed legislation that would delay for two years ACA’s health insurance premium fee. Under the ACA, a new tax is imposed on health insurance companies beginning in 2014. The expected cost of such a delay is about $15 billion, which is significantly less than the $100 billion price tag of a permanent repeal.

A group of 10 Senate Democrats led by Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) sent a letter to HHS Sec. Sebelius on October 25 urging her to extend the ACA enrollment deadline due to problems with the exchange website. Senators MarkBegich (D-Alaska), Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Kay Hagan (D-N.C.), Michael Heinrich (D-N.M.) Mary Landrieu (D-La.), Mark Pryor (D-Ark.), Mark Udall (D-Colo.), and Tom Udall (D-N.M.) also signed the letter.

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, MedPAC, the independent body that advises Congress on issues affecting the administration, will meet this week on November 7 and 8. The meeting will be broken into the following sessions: synchronizing Medicare policy across delivery systems, measuring quality across Medicare’s delivery systems, Medicare accountable care organizations (ACOs), rationalizing Medicare’s payment for post-acute care, improving Medicare payment for chronically critically ill patients in hospital settings, Medicare managed care topics, initial approach to the payment update and other policy options for physicians and other health professionals, and Medicare beneficiaries’ access to hospital care and near-term changes in Medicare’s payment policies.

AT THE AGENCIES

Traditionally, the annual Medicare physician fee schedule is released around November 1; however, it is delayed this year due to the government's shutdown, which slowed down agency work. Also delayed are three payment rules: Medicare’s End-Stage Renal Disease Prospective Payment System, the Hospital Outpatient Prospective and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems rule, and the Home Health Prospective Payment System final rule for 2014.

The online exchanges continue to malfunction and to be taken offline for long stretches of time. Americans whose insurance plans have been canceled are further frustrated by their inability to see their options and sign up for plans online. Others are concerned that if the young and healthy cannot sign up soon, insurers would be forced to raise premiums to cover the costs of older, sicker individuals. Additionally, newly released documents from the House Oversight Committee show that on the first day the federal exchange was open, only six individuals enrolled.

On October 28, CMS announced that the premiums and deductibles for Medicare Part B would not increase in 2014. CMS attributed the positive projections, in part, to the ACA. Additionally, CMS announced that seniors had saved $8.3 billion on Part D prescriptions since the ACA went into effect.

CMS announced that it plans to re-open the Comprehensive End Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) Care Initiative to solicit additional participation and respond to stakeholder feedback. The new initiative will allow CMS to partner with groups of health care providers and suppliers to test and evaluate a new model of payment and care delivery specific to Medicare beneficiaries with ESRD.

IN THE WHITE HOUSE

As the White House appoints technical experts to resolve technical problems with the health insurance exchanges, news is surfacing that in the immediate aftermath of the ACA being signed into law, high-level advisors to President Obama, including Larry Summers, director of the White House’s National Economic Council, and Peter Orszag, head of the Office of Management and Budget, agreed with an outside advisor well known for his health policy expertise, David Cutler, who argued that to make the ACA work, those with business, technology and insurance experience should be included in developing the exchanges.

On October 30, President Obama spoke about the Affordable Care Act in Boston. With Faneuil Hall (where former Governor Romney signed Massachusetts’ health reform into law) as a backdrop, President Obama addressed criticisms that he had broken his pledge to Americans that they would be able to keep their health insurance plans if they liked them. The President also discussed the benefits of the law that are already in effect and working well.

On November 4, President Obama spoke about enrolling Americas on health insurance exchanges at an Organizing for Action event. Organizing for Action is the political nonprofit that mobilizes support for the White House agenda.

IN THE COURTS

On November 1, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia overturned a lower court’s ruling and said that the individual owners of Freshway Foods and Freshway Logistics of Sidney, Ohio, should not have to provide coverage for contraception to their employees. The court noted that only individuals could bring these cases, not corporations. The decision came out 2-1, and the majority judges said forcing the owners to cover employees’ contraception was a violation of the owners’ religious rights.

To view our compilation of recent health care reform implementation news, click here.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cozen O'Connor | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cozen O'Connor
Contact
more
less

Cozen O'Connor on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!