Health Headlines: Also in the News


340B “Mega-Reg” Under Review by OMB – The Health Resources and Service Administration (HRSA), Office of Pharmacy Affairs sent the long-awaited 340B Proposed Rule to the Office of Budget and Management Affairs (OMB) last week for the proposed rule’s next level of review before publication in the Federal Register, which is anticipated to be in June.  The OMB’s website reflects that the proposed rule was received on April 9.  Often referred to as the “mega-reg,” the proposed rule is expected to cover, among other issues, the definition of an eligible patient, compliance requirements for contract pharmacies, hospital eligibility criteria, and eligibility of off-site facilities.  Additionally, HRSA has posted on its website updated hospital registration instructions for the 340B program, now requiring certain worksheets from the hospital’s most recently filed cost report, as well as a detailed outline covering HRSA’s  review process for determining eligibility in the 340B program. 

Physician Payment Data Posted by CMS – In keeping with its earlier announcement that it would provide “unprecedented access” to information on services delivered by individual physicians and certain other health care professionals in 2012, CMS has posted on its website the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File.  The published data provides the public with insight on how much physicians were paid by the Medicare program in 2012 for services provided to Medicare beneficiaries.  Since its publication, the data release has been criticized by many physicians as a raw data release with little context for the public to interpret the data.   

Ninth Circuit Upholds Penalty for Late Data Submissions – In an April 7, 2014 decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld CMS’s decision to penalize a hospital more than $500,000 for the late submission of quality data.  The hospital had a contract with a third-party vendor to submit data on the hospital’s behalf for the Reporting Hospital Quality Data for Annual Payment Update (RHQDAPU) Program.  The vendor did not submit the data to CMS until 12 hours after the established deadline.  The hospital argued that the late submission was inconsequential to the RHQDAPU Program’s objectives, but the court held that CMS’s strict adherence to the deadline – and the agency’s decision to hold hospitals responsible for the actions of third-party vendors – was not arbitrary and capricious.  The opinion is available here.

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.