High Court Decision In Pom V. Coke Could End Food Wars

more+
less-

The U.S. Supreme Court has decided to wade into a battle between Pom Wonderful and The Coca-Cola Co. over whether the labels on Coke’s Minute Maid pomegranate-blueberry juice blend violate the Lanham Act’s prohibition against false advertising.

Despite Solicitor General Donald Verrilli’s recommendation that the court deny Pom’s petition, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case, agreeing to resolve the question of “whether the court of appeals erred in holding that a private party cannot bring a Lanham Act claim challenging a product label regulated under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.” Although the issue to be addressed by the court is focused on claims involving the Lanham Act — a federal false-advertising law typically invoked in business disputes between competitors — the decision could put an end to the recent explosion of consumer class action food-mislabeling litigation involving state law claims.

Originally published in Law360 on January 28, 2014.

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Coca Cola, False Advertising, Lanham Act, POM Wonderful, SCOTUS

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Communications & Media Updates, Consumer Protection Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »