High Court Decision In Pom V. Coke Could End Food Wars

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact

The U.S. Supreme Court has decided to wade into a battle between Pom Wonderful and The Coca-Cola Co. over whether the labels on Coke’s Minute Maid pomegranate-blueberry juice blend violate the Lanham Act’s prohibition against false advertising.

Despite Solicitor General Donald Verrilli’s recommendation that the court deny Pom’s petition, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case, agreeing to resolve the question of “whether the court of appeals erred in holding that a private party cannot bring a Lanham Act claim challenging a product label regulated under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.” Although the issue to be addressed by the court is focused on claims involving the Lanham Act — a federal false-advertising law typically invoked in business disputes between competitors — the decision could put an end to the recent explosion of consumer class action food-mislabeling litigation involving state law claims.

Originally published in Law360 on January 28, 2014.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Morrison & Foerster LLP
Contact
more
less

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide