Hits And Misses In DOD IR&D Rule


Originally published in Law360, March 20, 2012.

Last March, the U.S. Department of Defense issued a proposed rule regarding the reporting requirements for independent research and development, which raised concerns about how the proposed change would tie recoverability of IR&D costs to new reporting and disclosure requirements.

Recently, Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement 231.205-18(c) was finalized, with changes. See 77 Fed. Reg. 4632 (Jan. 30, 2012). This final rule is a mixed bag that got some things right, but also leaves some of the most serious issues unresolved.

First — three things that the DOD got right:

1) Elimination of the $50,000 Threshold

The proposed rule required IR&D reports from all major contractors generating more than $50,000 annually in IR&D costs. However, the regulations define "major contractors" as contractors whose covered segments are allocated more than $11,000,000 in total IR&D costs during the preceding fiscal year. The two different dollar thresholds created confusion as to who should be reporting and what projects should be included in these reports.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:


Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.