Hmm. Will there be Business Court Reform this year??


We may have gotten ahead of ourselves in our excitement to see an effort to modernize (and enhance??) North Carolina's Business Court. Our first clue was that a Senate Bill (SB 853) was filed with no companion bill in the House -- not a great sign. Another clue is that the bill was not the result of interim study committee vetting. In fact, we were not the only ones surprised to see the bill filed. We've heard members of the House were also surprised. Uh oh. And I have not been able to confirm the involvement of any outside group in the drafting of the bill aside from the NC Chamber -- although the NC Chamber is having a pretty good run this session. Again.

So today we looked through the Senate's $21 Billion Budget for clues (looking for some Business Court "enhancement" opportunity). What we found was a new take on last year's Senate attempt to abolish Special Superior Court Judges. The Senate's budget bill eliminates 4 Special Superior Court Judgeships by phasing them out between now and 2016 upon resignation, retirement, or end of term for that Judge. No mention of shifting those resources or expanding the Business Court.

If you are looking to modernize and enhance the NC Business Court you have work to do. And for now you need to do that work with the NC Chamber. We'll be checking in with NC Chamber lobbyist John Goodman to see what they think will happen with the bill this session.

A long ago Speaker's Staffer (not me) once said, "The opposing party is our adversary. The opposing Chamber is our enemy." This House and this Senate, though both run with strong Republican majorities, are not in sync on all issues. Sometimes the first to blink loses; it's not clear to me the House is even looking.

Mack Sperling at Brooks Pierce wrote a great summary of the bill from a litigator's perspective, to which I respectfully defer here:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.