Honest Services Fraud: Skilling, Black, and Weyhrauch


Skilling v. United States, Docket No. 08-1394 (U.S. June 24, 2010); Black v. United States, Docket No. 08-876 (U.S. June 24, 2010); Weyhrauch v. United States, Docket No. 08-1196 (U.S. June 24, 2010).

In a set of opinions handed down on June 24, 2010, the Supreme Court significantly narrowed the scope of the honest services fraud statute but stopped short of striking down the statute as unconstitutionally vague.

In Skilling v. United States, the Court considered the appeal of Jeffrey Skilling, former CEO of Enron. In the wake of Enron’s collapse, Skilling was tried and convicted of, among other things, a conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud by depriving Enron and its shareholders of the intangible right of his honest services. One of the issues Skilling raised on appeal was the validity of the honest services fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1346.

The Court unanimously reversed Skilling’s honest services fraud conviction, with five justices joining Justice Ginsburg’s opinion for the Court, and two justices signing onto a concurring opinion by Justice Scalia.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Organization Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Criminal Law Updates, Securities Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »