Hospitals Win a Case Challenging CMS Policy to Include Part C Days in the SSI Fraction in the Medicare DSH Formula

Explore:  CMS Medicare

On November 15, 2012, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia released a 33-page opinion ruling in favor of a group of hospitals that had challenged CMS’s policy of including Medicare Part C patient days in the SSI fraction in the Medicare DSH formula. The effect of CMS’s policy, announced in 2004, but not applied until 2009, albeit retrospectively to 2006, was to reduce Medicare DSH payments.  While the effect of CMS’s policy varies considerably from hospital to hospital, the result of this case, if applied to all Medicare DSH hospitals, would likely have a material impact on improving Medicare DSH payments.  King & Spalding organized the appealing group of hospitals and was co-counsel in the case.  A copy of the opinion can be seen by clicking here

Since SSI enrollees are less likely to be enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan (formerly Medicare+Choice), including these Part C patients in the SSI fraction had the effect of reducing the value of that fraction, and hence, reduced Medicare DSH payments.  Virtually all hospitals were hurt by CMS’s policy, but there are some large hospitals with high DSH percentages for which the annual adverse effect is in excess of $1 million. 

CMS has 60 days within which to appeal.  If CMS does appeal, it is extremely unlikely that it would apply the District Court’s decision vacating its policy to include Part C patients in the SSI fraction unless and until the hospitals win the appeal.  The appellate decision probably would not be issued until mid-2014. 

All DSH hospitals should consider appealing this issue.  For cost reports filed in the future, all DSH hospitals should include this item as a “protested item” to avoid having CMS assert that the hospital failed to protect its appeal rights.  For prior years, there are strong arguments that hospitals can appeal regardless of whether they included a claim on their cost reports, but the government may contend that there is no jurisdiction over such appeals. 

Reporter, Dennis Barry, Washington, D.C., +1 202 626 2959,

Written by:

Published In:


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.