Towns where housing is not expensive have recently developed a new justification for denying a comprehensive permit application: claiming that there is no Chapter 40B “regional need for low or moderate income housing” because the town’s existing market-rate housing is affordable to persons of low or moderate income. In a case litigated by Mintz Levin, the Housing Appeals Committee (HAC) has now rejected that theory as a matter of law. The HAC decision, Hollis Hills, LLC v. Lunenburg Zoning Board of Appeals (HAC No. 07-13, Dec. 4, 2009) also clarified how the municipal “planning defense” is applied, and ruled that an adjoining-site zoning violation that allegedly “infects” the project site is relevant only if the zoning violation causes a health or safety problem on the site that outweighs the regional need for affordable housing.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.