Housing Advisory: Supreme Judicial Court Rules That a Town May Continue to Issue Comprehensive Permits Even After Meeting Its Minimum Affordable Housing Obligation of 10%


In yet another case about what happens when a town meets its minimum affordable housing obligation, the Supreme Judicial Court has held that a zoning board of appeals has the discretion to continue to grant comprehensive permits under M.G.L. c. 40B, §§ 20-23 if it wishes, even after the town has reached one of Chapter 40B's minimum subsidized housing goals. The court thus rejected abutters' claims that because 10% of the town's housing units already qualified as subsidized housing, the affordable housing developer could only obtain relief from local zoning by obtaining a variance.

See this Housing Advisory for a review of Boothroyd v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Amherst, SJC-09896 (Mass. June 14, 2007)

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Mintz Levin | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.