Hypothetical - Nontraditional Claims Against Lawyers


Lately, there has been a proliferation of claims against lawyers and law firms beyond the traditional legal malpractice claims brought by clients. Although lawyers generally owe no fiduciary duty to third parties, they may find themselves liable for their actions under a variety of different legal theories, including fraud, negligent misrepresentation, aiding and abetting, and more.

In December 2012, I participated on an ethics panel at the Practicing Law Institute addressing unusual or non-traditional claims against lawyers. This is the hypothetical I created for the program.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Nicole Hyland, Frankfurt Kurnit Klein & Selz | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.