Last month the Upper Tribunal (the "Tribunal") rejected an appeal by Ian Hannam ("Hannam") against the Financial Services Authority's ("FSA") (predecessor to the Financial Conduct Authority) controversial 2012 decision that he had committed market abuse. Few cases have caused more discussion amongst London's bankers than the FSA's pursuit of Hannam for market abuse. Some commentators take the view that the FSA acted inappropriately by fining Hannam for simply doing what bankers have always done - sharing bits of information with potential investors to generate interest in a client. Others believe that the FSA behaved in an equitable way enforcing its rules against disclosure of inside information.
Regardless of the view held, the Tribunal's decision sends a clear message as to what conduct will be classified as market abuse and the consequences of failing to follow internal procedures for dealing with inside information.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Banks, Enforcement, Equity Markets, Financial Markets, FSA, Insider Trading, JPMorgan Chase, UK
Published In: Business Torts Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Finance & Banking Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising