Illinois Appellate Court Vacates Two Judgments Entered Against Honeywell for Failing to Produce Consultant at Trial

more+
less-

Officer, director, employee or independent contractor? The nature of a company's relationship with its consultant determines its obligation to produce that person at trial, an Illinois appellate court ruled in early February 2012.

In Hoogerwerf, etc. v. Honeywell Int'l, Inc., No. 4-11-0329 (cons), 2012 IL App. (4th) 110329 (Ill. Ct. App. Feb. 2, 2012), the Illinois Appellate Court considered two judgments entered against Honeywell in a pair of asbestos-related civil conspiracy actions. In each action, the trial court entered a default judgment against Honeywell on the issues of liability and causation when it found that Honeywell failed to produce its consultant as a witness at trial. The court's ruling was based on Illinois Supreme Court Rule 237(b), which allows any party to require the appearance of the opposing party's officer, director or employee at trial.

Honeywell's primary argument was that the consultant was not an officer, director or employee of Honeywell at the time of trial. The consultant had worked as an industrial hygienist and corporate head of product safety for a predecessor company that later merged with Honeywell after his departure in 1997. The consultant then ran his own firm and primarily assisted Honeywell in asbestos litigation, providing representative corporate information regarding products and events that occurred long ago. Honeywell designated the consultant as an "independent contractor," although the majority of his total consulting revenues derived from his work with Honeywell, he regularly reviewed and verified Honeywell's written discovery responses, and he regularly testified at depositions and trials on behalf of Honeywell.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Organization Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Environmental Updates, Toxic Torts Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Sedgwick LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »