In In re BioClinica, Inc. Shareholder Litigation, the Delaware Court of Chancery in a memorandum opinion on a motion to expedite examined the cumulative effect of deal protection devices to determine whether they should have been deemed preclusive under Omnicare.
The plaintiffs in BioClinica argued that the impact of a combination of (i) a standstill provision in the confidentiality agreement signed by a potential alternative bidder, which prevented that bidder from acquiring BioClinica other than through a tender offer, and (ii) a rights plan constituted an impermissible lock-up, because the announcement of a tender offer would trigger BioClinica’s poison pill.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Confidentiality Agreements, Hostile Takeover, Poison Pill, Shareholder Litigation, Shareholder Rights, Standstill Agreements, Tender Offers
Published In: Business Organization Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Mergers & Acquisitions Updates, Science, Computers & Technology Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising