In re MFW Decision Upheld by Delaware Supreme Court

Last week in Kahn v. M&F Worldwide Corp. (Del. March 14, 2014), the Delaware Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Court of Chancery in the In re MFW Shareholders Litigation (Del. Ch. May 29, 2013) case and also upheld the grant of summary judgment to the defendants.

In that decision, as we discussed here, the Court of Chancery held that the business judgment standard of review will apply to going private mergers with a controlling stockholder and its subsidiary if and only if the merger is conditioned on two specific stockholder protective measures. Typically, transactions that involve a controlling stockholder are subject to the entire fairness level of review, which shifts the burden to the controlling stockholder to show that the transaction is fair to the minority shareholders.

Following the Kahn v. M&F Worldwide case, the business judgment standard of review will apply if and only if the controlling stockholder agrees at the outset to proceed with the merger only if it receives the approval of:

(1) an attentive special committee comprised of directors who are independent of the controlling stockholder, fully empowered to decline the transaction and retain its own financial and legal advisors, and satisfies its duty of care in negotiating fair price, and

(2) a majority of the unaffiliated stockholders, who are uncoerced in their vote and fully informed.

While this affirmation by Delaware’s highest court of the MFW decision is an important clarification of the process that can be used in mergers involving a controlling stockholder to get business judgment review, it also highlights challenges of building a record that each of the conditions were met prior to consummation.

In addition, both the controlling stockholder and the target company have a vested interest in ensuring that they have experienced, sophisticated M&A counsel, as the requirement that these conditions should be met from the outset is not necessarily intuitive. Parties should include the conditions in the bid letter or in the initial response.

Here, the Delaware Supreme Court summarizes its new standard as follows: “in controller buyouts, the business judgment standard of review will be applied if and only if:

(i) the controller conditions the procession of the transaction on the approval of both a Special Committee and a majority of the minority stockholders

(ii) the Special Committee is independent

(iii) the Special Committee is empowered to freely select its own advisors and to say no definitively

(iv) the Special Committee meets its duty of care in negotiating a fair price

(v) the vote of the minority is informed

(vi) there is no coercion of the minority.”

Interestingly, the court indicated in a footnote that under this new standard the Verified Consolidated Class Action Complaint would have survived a motion to dismiss because of allegations that called into question the adequacy of the negotiations by the Special Committee regarding price.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.