Incontestable - September 2010


In this Issue - Civil Cases; Lou v. Otis Elevator Co., 77 Mass. App. Ct. 571 (Sept. 3, 2010); Tiffany (NJ) Inc. v. eBay, Inc., 2010 WL 3733894 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 10, 2010); M.C.I. Foods, Inc. v. Bunte, Canc. No. 92046056 (TTAB Sept. 13, 2010); Super Bakery, Inc. v. Benedict, Canc. No. 92047859 (TTAB Sept. 16, 2010)

Lou v. Otis Elevator Co. ABSTRACT - In a question of first impression, a three-judge panel for the Massachusetts Appeals Court affirmed a multimillion-dollar jury verdict against Otis Elevator Co. for liability as a trademark licensor under the “apparent manufacturer” doctrine for injuries resulting from an escalator accident in China, despite the fact that defendant did not sell or manufacture the escalator. The court held that there was ample evidence for a jury to find that defendant “participated substantially in the design or manufacture of the escalator,” as required under the court’s interpretation of the apparent manufacturer doctrine, by licensing its trademarks and providing product-design information, production-method rights, technical know-how, and managerial support to the manufacturer.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, General Business Updates, Intellectual Property Updates, Products Liability Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Finnegan | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »