Nexus — whether a corporation has a sufficient connection such that it may be taxed by a state — is one of the most important issues in state tax. Various legal theories have been asserted (and are being asserted) to justify a state’s imposition of a tax obligation on a corporation. While some courts have accepted such theories, several courts have pushed back against states’ assertions of jurisdiction, including on due process grounds.
One theory — that a corporation has nexus with a state because it is part of the unitary business of an in-state taxpayer — is the primary theory discussed in this article. The Maryland Court of Special Appeals, in Comptroller of the Treasury v. Gore Enterprise Holdings, Inc., recently articulated that theory, stating that if ‘‘a parent company undoubtedly has a requisite nexus, the only question is whether the subsidiary partakes in the parent’s unitary business; if so, it inherits the parent’s nexus. . . .’’
Originally published in State Tax Notes on 7/1/2013.
Please see full alert below for more information.
Firefox recommends the PDF Plugin for Mac OS X for viewing PDF documents in your browser.
We can also show you Legal Updates using the Google Viewer; however, you will need to be logged into Google Docs to view them.
Please choose one of the above to proceed!
LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.
Topics: Business Taxes, Corporate Taxes, Due Process, Jurisdiction, Nexus, Sufficient Nexus
Published In: Business Organization Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Tax Updates
DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.
© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising