Insurance Coverage For Long Tail Injuries In California

The California Supreme Court recently ruled, in a case involving environmental damage at a State controlled waste site, that multiple insurers, who provided coverage to the State at different periods between 1964-1976, are each responsible up to policy limits for long tail injuries, and that allocating liability based on damage caused during each separate policy period is not feasible or necessary. [State of California v. Continental Ins. Co. 8/9/12]

In the Continental case, the Supreme Court “rejected the insurers’ contention that they could not be liable for property damage occurring outside their respective policy periods.” The Court did so based on the “all sums” language in their commercial general liability (CGL) policies.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Business Torts Updates, General Business Updates, Environmental Updates, Government Contracting Updates, Insurance Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Robert Freedman - Partner at Tharpe & Howell, LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »