Insurance Law Update - South Carolina Attempts to Clean Up the ‘Intellectual Mess’ Over the Meaning of ‘Occurrence’ in Construction Defect Claims - February 2011

more+
less-

Supreme Court of South Carolina

In Crossmann Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. Harleysville Mut. Ins. Co., ___ S.E. 2d ___, 2011 WL 93716 (S.C. January 7, 2011), the Supreme Court of South Carolina held that there is no coverage under a commercial general liability (CGL) policy for liability that arises from nothing more than the natural and probable consequences of defective construction.

Harleysville Mutual Insurance Company issued a CGL policy to the developers of waterfront condominiums. After the condos were built and sold, the purchasers sued the insured developers, alleging that defective construction of the condos’ siding installed by subcontractors had resulted in significant water intrusion, causing substantial decay and deterioration. After settling the purchasers’ claims for $16.8 million, the insureds filed a declaratory judgment action to determine if coverage existed under the Harleysville policy. The parties stipulated to the facts, and the trial court ruled that the CGL policy provided coverage under the “subcontractor exception” to the “your work” exclusion.

The South Carolina Supreme Court reversed.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

more+
less-

Sedgwick LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×