Intellectual Property and Technology News - Issue 20, Q4 2013

In This Issue:

- CHINA AMENDS TRADEMARK LAW: PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS FOR BRAND OWNERS

- SUPREME COURT CORNER

- A CASE FOR COUNTERFEIT TRADE DRESS

- MANAGING YOUR IP ACROSS BORDERS

- Excerpt from A Case for Counterfeit Trade Dress:

Can a product which imitates the look and feel of another product, but does not use the trademarked brand name, still be considered a “counterfeit” product under United States law? Owners of popular brands (like Louis Vuitton and Tiffany) are well acquainted with the counterfeiters’ practice of applying their brand name or logo to fake goods, and often respond with a claim pursuant to Section 32 of the Lanham Act alleging use of a “counterfeit mark.”

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Brand, China, Counterfeiting, Cross-Border, SCOTUS, Trade Dress, Trademarks

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates, International Trade Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© DLA Piper | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »