Internet-Based Personal Jurisdiction: An Unnecessary Legal Doctrine

more+
less-

Courts have been struggling with the issue of personal jurisdiction based on Internet activity since the mid-1990s. For some reason, courts were either reluctant or technologically ill-equipped to apply long-standing principles of personal jurisdiction to Internet-based causes of action. Courts initially deemed the Internet too unique and complex to fit squarely within the ambit of traditional personal jurisdiction analysis. Therefore, courts all over the United States began crafting new tests of Internet-based personal jurisdiction from scratch.

This paper argues that a separate legal doctrine for Internet-based personal jurisdiction is unnecessary. Traditional personal jurisdiction analysis is flexible enough to accommodate changes in technology and Internet-based activities can be analyzed under these existing requirements. Witnessing the courts spin their wheels while trying to come to a consensus on a new legal doctrine is proof that a specific test for Internet-based personal jurisdiction is inappropriate and gratuitous.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© JAG Legal Services | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

JAG Legal Services on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×