Introducing Personal Liability Into Corporate Negligence: An Analysis of the Trek Leather Decision

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Contact

Are you an owner or officer of a small or midsize business? An import or trade compliance professional? Someone whose job responsibilities include some aspect of the process of importing merchandise into the United States, whether or not that includes the "formal entry" of merchandise? As of September 16, 2014, the possibility of finding yourself personally exposed to potentially massive civil penalties for your company's import activities has skyrocketed.

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its en banc opinion on September 16 in the closely watched case of United States v. Trek Leather, Inc. This case stems from a civil penalty issued by US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to an importing company, Trek Leather, and its president, Harish Shadadpuri, for Trek Leather's failure to declare the value of assists to imported suits. The government sought to impose civil penalties against both the company and Mr. Shadadpuri under the customs civil penalty statute, 19 USC § 1592.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
Contact
more
less

Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide