Investment Banks Must Have and Enforce Policies to Prevent Misuse of Material, Nonpublic Information


The Securities and Exchange Commission recently settled charges that a Philadelphia-based broker-dealer (the “Broker-Dealer”) failed to establish and enforce policies and procedures to prevent the misuse of material, nonpublic information, as required by law. The Broker-Dealer, without admitting or denying the findings, agreed to be censured and to pay an $850,000 penalty to settle the SEC’s administrative proceeding. It also agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and agreed to retain a consultant to develop such policies and procedures.

The SEC’s Order reinforces the need for broker-dealers to have effective informational firewalls and policies and procedures, as well as the need to enforce existing procedures. Section 15(g) of the Exchange Act, requires brokers and dealers registered with the SEC to establish, maintain and enforce written policies and procedures reasonably designed, taking into consideration the nature of such broker’s or dealer’s business, to prevent the misuse, in violation of the Exchange Act or the rules or regulations thereunder, of material, nonpublic information by such broker or dealer or any person associated with such broker or dealer. Section 15(g) does not prescribe particular procedures. In response, the financial industry implemented or enhanced their existing “Chinese Walls,” which are intended to be “self-enforced informational barrier[s] consisting of systematic, as opposed to ad hoc, procedural and structural arrangements . . . designed to stem the flow of knowledge (in particular, unpublished price sensitive information) between different divisions within a multi-capacity financial intermediary with conflicting interests and obligations.” In 1990, the SEC’s Division of Market Regulation issued a report on informational barriers within financial firms, and it has been consistent in policing Section 15(g) violations. The Order once again demonstrates the consequences of failing to have strong policies or to enforce existing ones.

Please see full bulletin below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.