Iowa Dentist Lawfully Fires Attractive Female Assistant Because She Was A Threat To His Marriage

by Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP
Contact

In the salacious realm of sex discrimination law, the Iowa Supreme Court recently rendered an opinion that just might contend for the best blog fodder of 2013. Whether the decision in Nelson v. James H. Knight, DDS, P.C. will have any ripples in equal employment opportunity law outside Iowa remains to be seen, but it is surely thought provoking.

Quick Facts

Melissa Nelson, a dental assistant in Fort Dodge, Iowa, worked alongside Dr. James Knight, a dentist, for 10 years, starting not long after she received her certification from a local community college at age 20.  Nelson and Knight, who were both married, developed a close working relationship over the years, and it seems that, at a minimum, Nelson had a closer relationship with Knight than other employees did.  Knight thought of Nelson as a good employee, and Nelson generally thought that Knight treated her respectfully.

Over the last year and a half of her employment, Knight complained to Nelson that her clothing was too tight, revealing and “distracting.”  He often asked her to put on a lab coat, apparently to conceal her figure, which she did.  Nelson denied that her clothes were tight fitting.

During the last six months of her employment, Nelson and Knight began texting each other.  On one occasion where Knight again said that Nelson’s clothing was too tight, and Nelson texted that she did not think Knight was being fair, Knight responded that it was a good thing her pants were not also tight, because then he “would get it coming and going.”  On another occasion, in response to Nelson’s statement that her sexual encounters with her husband were infrequent, Knight commented that such behavior was akin to “having a Lamborghini in the garage and never driving it.”

Knight’s wife discovered this relationship and texting, and apparently insisted that Nelson be terminated because she was a threat to the Knights’ marriage.

The Lawsuit and the Iowa Supreme Court’s Decision

Nelson later sued under Iowa’s law prohibiting sex discrimination.  She did not claim sexual harassment – which was surely a strategic blunder.  Instead, she claimed that she had been terminated because of her gender, i.e., she would not have been terminated if she were a man.  The Court disagreed, holding that she was terminated because of jealousy over a consensual relationship, which it viewed as “an isolated employment decision based on personal relations” versus “a decision based on gender itself.”

Breaking It Down

It is relatively easy to armchair quarterback this and say that the Iowa Supreme Court and Nelson’s lawyers botched this. Skeptics will argue that Knight would not have made those comments and his wife would not have been threatened if Nelson was a male, nor would he apply the same attractiveness standards to a male employee.  And it certainly defies logic why, under these circumstances, Nelson would not bring a hostile environment sexual harassment claim given Knight’s seeming attraction to Nelson.

All of this said, the Court’s opinion, though unpalatable, is legally defensible.  Anti-discrimination laws, including those prohibiting gender discrimination, are not fairness or civility laws, as courts have often observed.  There is no doubt that Knight’s firing of Nelson just smells bad—he essentially terminated an employee because he couldn’t control his own base instincts, because his jealous wife forced his hand, or both.  But finding otherwise would have required the Court to wade into the dynamics of consensual workplace relationships.  The Court viewed this as a slippery slope that it was not required to, and would not, venture onto.

Having said that, this case does seem like a bit of an outlier.  First, as mentioned above, Nelson inexplicably did not bring a sexual harassment/hostile work environment claim and the court noted that it would not opine as to the result had it been brought.  Second, the relationship between Knight and Nelson was sexually charged in a somewhat consensual way, which would distinguish this from other cases where a male supervisor seemingly cannot resist an attractive female employee.  Third, and perhaps most significantly, it is unlikely that other courts, faced with this same scenario, would grant summary judgment on a case where a jealous wife forces her husband to fire a female employee who he cannot resist.  To be sure, some other courts have relied on the same fine distinctions as did the Iowa Supreme Court here, but it is not hard to see other courts being critical of this case in the future.

 

Written by:

Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP
Contact
more
less

Hirschfeld Kraemer LLP on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.