In this issue:

- 10 Reasons Every Defendant in Patent Litigation Should Consider Inter Partes Review

- Reasons to Think Twice Before Initiating Inter Partes Review

- First AIA Roundtable Hints at More Conservative Approach to PTAB Review

- Federal Circuit To Review PTAB Post-Grant Review Proceedings in SAP v. Versata

- Patent Trial and Appeal Board Statistics

- Hurry Up and Settle! Settling Early to Avoid PTAB Refusal to Terminate IPR

- The Tide May Be Changing: The PTAB Allows Two Patents to Emerge from IPR Unscathed

- Snapshot Overview of Options for Post-Issuance Challenges Before the PTAB

- Excerpt from 10 Reasons Every Defendant in Patent Litigation Should Consider Inter Partes Review:

Numerous articles and practitioners are touting inter partes review proceedings, and for good reason. We provide a breakdown of why these proceedings are considered pro-petitioner and why every patent infringement defendant should give IPR serious consideration.

Please see full newsletter below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  America Invents Act, Inter Partes Review Proceedings, Patent Litigation, Patent Trial and Appeal Board

Published In: Civil Procedure Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Venable LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


With nearly 600 attorneys in offices across the country practicing in all areas of corporate and... View Profile »

Follow Venable LLP:

Reporters on Deadline