IP Newsflash - December 2014: DISTRICT COURT CASES: A Contrary Construction from Reexamination Is No Basis to Reconsider a Previous Claim Construction Ruling

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Contact

On December 10, 2014, the Southern District of New York denied plaintiff’s motion to reconsider a 2006 claim construction ruling and vacate a related summary judgment order. Plaintiff requested the relief following a contrary claim construction ruling in an ex parte reexamination. The court summarized plaintiff’s argument stating “although [plaintiff] concedes that its proposed course of action would result in disrupting litigation which has relied, for eight years, on the 2006 Markman ruling, it nevertheless contends that ‘reconsideration would promote judicial economy and efficiency’ because ‘reversal [of the 2006 Markman ruling] is likely.’”

The court disagreed with plaintiff for two reasons. First, Judge Sullivan noted that “put simply, the PTO Ruling is not binding on this court, nor is it binding on the Federal Circuit.” Second, “[plaintiff] has repeatedly sought -- and has been repeatedly denied -- reconsideration of the 2006 Markman ruling based on the contrary construction in [another case involving the same patent]. The fact that the PTO ruling is apparently consistent with [that other case] does not alter the court's conclusion about whether reconsideration is warranted, nor does it undermine the soundness of the 2006 Markman ruling.” In closing, the court held that “other than a generic invocation of judicial economy, [plaintiff] fails to provide any rationale for the court to suddenly be swayed by a contrary construction.”

Enzo Biochem, Inc., et al v. Molecular Probes, 1-03-cv-03816 (S.D.N.Y. December 10, 2014).

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP
Contact
more
less

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Custom Email Digest
- hide
- hide