IP Update, Vol. 14, No. 3, March 2011


In This Issue:


Is §292 (Qui Tam) Statute Unconstitutional? Need More than Mouse Disclosure and a Few CIPs to Support Human Antibody Claims; Limitation on the Number of Asserted Claims Does Not Violate Due Process Rights; State Law License Defense to Hypothetical Infringement Suit Satisfies Federal Jurisdiction; Reasonable Royalties Must Be Considered in the Absence of Lost Profits; Chapter Next in the Debate Over Role of the Specification in Claim Construction; I’ll Take the Academic Rate Please; Federal Circuit Denies Rehearing in Prosecution Laches Case; Patent Reform Act Becomes “America Invents Act” of 2011; Federal Trade Commission Releases Report on the Patent System; and; Is EU-Wide Patent Protection on the Horizon?


VERICHECK Found Suggestive for Check Verification Services; “Internet Trinity” No Longer Holy In Internet Trademark Cases; and; “Outer Limits” of Lanham Act Sustain Consumer Class Action Amid Allegations of Competitive Injury.


Boop-Oop-A-Doop – Oops! Family of Betty Boop Creator Loses Infringement Claims Due to Flawed Chain of Title; Flower Bed Installation Not Protected by Copyright Act; Copyright Infringement of Test Questions Not Always Redressable; and; Supreme Court Grants Cert on Challenge to Copyright Restoration.

Please see full publication below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Written by:


McDermott Will & Emery on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.