Is a plaintiff required to serve a UIM/UM carrier in accordance with rule 4?

Explore:  Car Accident UI/UIM

Yes, and if they don’t properly serve the UIM/UM carrier then the case will be dismissed according to the recent NC Court of Appeals decision of Kahihu v. Brunson.

In Kahihu, plaintiff claims she was injured in a car wreck.  Plaintiff’s attorney served plaintiff’s UM insurance carrier with a copy of the Complaint via certified mail.  The case was dismissed, however, because the UM carrier was not properly served with a Summons.  It didn’t matter that the defendant, Brunson, had been properly served with a Summons and Complaint since the UM carrier and Brunson are separate entities.  It also didn’t matter that the UM carrier answered the Complaint because the UM carrier preserved all necessary service defenses in the Answer.


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cranfill Sumner & Hartzog LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.