Tennessee v. Netto

Is the Tennessee state statute prohibiting lotteries and pyramid clubs unconstitutionally vague?


The Tennessee Supreme Court ruled that the statute was not vague. To be found unconstitutionally vague, a statute must leave people of common intelligence to guess at its meaning. The Tennessee State Constitution flatly forbids lotteries in plain language, and the state statute in question had defined a pyramid club to be a lottery. The statute uses the plain language of common experience, and no dictionary is needed to define the terms. While the statute may not be absolutely precise, absolute precision is not necessary for a statute to be constitutional.

Case and case summary are also available online at: http://www.mlmlegal.com/legal-cases/Tennessee_v_Netto.php

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Reference Info:State, 6th Circuit, Tennessee | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Babener & Associates | Attorney Advertising

Written by:


Babener & Associates on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.

Already signed up? Log in here

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.