It is Always the Right Time to Consider an ESOP?


If I had a dime for every time a business owner told me or one of my partners that it was not the “right time” to think about the succession plan for their business, I would be a rich man. Too often business owners are so busy working on the day to day issues that affect their business that they put on hold any discussion with their advisors about what will happen to their business when they are no longer able or willing to run it on a day to day basis until they think they are ready (“the right time”). However, it is impossible for a business owner to know when exactly the “right time” to think about business succession issues will occur.

Many times business owners face an unanticipated personal crisis that makes business succession planning all that much more urgent. In most of these cases, the business owner’s options become limited if the business is in “distress” because the owner has never properly planned for the possibility that something might happen to them which creates a bad situation for the business owner, their family and their employees. However, for those business owners who still may not think it is the “right time” to sell their business outright, implementing an employee stock ownership plan (ESOP) is a good way for a business owner to transition the ownership of their company to the company’s employees and also allow the business owner to stay involved in the business.

A sale of a company which does not involve an ESOP is generally an “all-or-nothing” deal where a third party purchaser acquires 100 percent of the assets or stock of the company, the new management group assumes control of the company and, in most cases, the prior business owner ceases to be employed with the company immediately or within several months after the deal closes. However, in a transaction using an ESOP, the business owner is dealing with a friendly group of employees who are used to the former owner of the business being involved in the company’s operations so they will be willing to facilitate this transaction on a timetable acceptable to business owner. In addition, most ESOP transactions are contingent on the owner staying around to help facilitate the transition. This is because when rank and file employees become owners of a company, they have to act differently and it may take some time for employees to start acting like owners and to take more initiative and control over the operation of the business. Thus, an ESOP transaction is very attractive to an owner who isn’t ready to retire and who still wants to continue to be involved in the operations of the business but needs to get some liquidity for family needs or to start planning for retirement.

Even if a business owner is ready to retire, some business owners might not want to sell their entire company right now since the value of the company may still be depressed as a result of recent economic conditions. However, by using an ESOP, the business owner can sell less than 100% of the stock of the company to get started with an ownership succession process and take some of “chips off the table”. Then, in a few years when the economy improves and valuations rebound, the business owner can do another transaction with their company’s ESOP to get the benefit of a higher value.

Other issues that can hinder the sale of the company in the current M&A marketplace is the fact that the financing required for a third party to buy the company may still be limited. This is because lending standards for banks are still very stringent and private equity funds are still having issues raising new capital to make additional acquisitions. However, ESOP deals can be structured so that owners can self-finance the deal by taking a note back from the company instead of taking all cash for their stock when they sell their company to an ESOP. Since business owners who are willing consider selling to an ESOP have a high degree of trust that their employees will be effective in running the business after the transaction, the business owner is more willing to take on the risk of being the creditor of the company after the sale.


Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Levenfeld Pearlstein | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.