It Was All A Dream

more+
less-

EmpBlog-7.15.2014-Suit Dreaming in Grass-iStock-PAID - RESIZEDThat may be what the NLRB and others are thinking right now. Remember all those rather aggressive decisions made by the NLRB about a couple of years ago? It is as if they never happened. In a unanimous decision, the United States Supreme Court has invalidated all decisions of the NLRB since January 2012, when President Obama appointed 3 of the 5 member NLRB during a time when Congress was convening every 3 days, to July 2013, when the Senate confirmed a 5 member board. In National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, the Supreme Court held that the president lacked authority to make the appointments as they were made at a time that did not constitute a congressional recess during which the president is permitted to make such appointments.

As a result of Noel Canning, the NLRB lacked a quorum to act on cases during the 18 month period from the January 2012 appointment until Congress voted to confirm 5 NLRB members in July of 2013. Accordingly, the decisions made during this time, many of which were considered controversial, are invalid and will now have to be reconsidered by the newly formed NLRB. These include rulings that the following policies violated the National Labor Relations Act: social media policies that prohibited statements damaging the employer or defaming any individual, or prohibited postings that are disrespectful, profane, or injurious to the image or reputation of the employer; a policy limiting employee discussions of ongoing investigations into potential employee misconduct; a policy restricting employees’ off-duty access to the workplace; and a policy to stop deducting union dues from paychecks after the expiration of the collective bargaining agreement.

But the dream may still become a reality. Since the post-July 2013 NLRB seems to hold views similar to its ill-conceived predecessor, it is likely that many of these issues will be decided along the same lines in the future. A prudent employer should therefore consider using the invalid decisions as a guide pending new decisions by the NLRB.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.
×
Loading...
×
×