Buck v Barb

JANET BUCK, Plaintiff and Appellant v. CLAIRE BARB, Defendant and Appellant.

more+
less-

Plaintiff Buck has appealed, and defendant Barb has cross-appealed, from a judgment entered in plaintiff's action for declaratory relief and an injunction.

Having considered the record and the briefs and arguments of the respective parties we find no merit in the appeal of plaintiff. But as to the sole issue raised by defendant relating to her attorney's fees for services rendered in the action, we conclude that the judgment must be reversed.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Residential Real Estate Updates

Reference Info:Decision | State, 9th Circuit, California | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Law Office of Howard L Hibbard | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

CONNECT

For over 30 years, the Law Office of Howard L. Hibbard has been recognized for offering creative and... View Profile »


Follow Law Office of Howard L Hibbard:

Reporters on Deadline