Seventh Circuit Allows Trademark Licensees to Continue Using License After Rejection of Licensing Agreement


The Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, in Sunbeam Products, Inc. v. Chicago American Manufacturing, LLC, recently issued a decision that holds contrary to the only other court of appeals that has addressed the issue — that rejection of a trademark licensing agreement by a debtor-licensor does not terminate the agreement and that a trademark licensee can thus continue using the license after rejection.

The Fourth Circuit’s Lubrizol Decision

In 1985, the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit issued a controversial opinion in Lubrizol Enterpris-es, Inc. v. Richmond Metal Finishers, Inc., holding that when an intellectual property license is rejected in bankruptcy, the licensee loses the ability to use any licensed copyrights, trademarks, and patents. In the Court’s Sunbeam opinion, Chief Judge Easterbrook noted that while “[n]o other court of appeals has agreed with Lubrizol — or for that matter disagreed with it,” “[s]cholars uniformly criticize Lubrizol.”

Please see full alert below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Bankruptcy Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, General Business Updates, Conflict of Laws Updates, Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Dechert LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »