Inherent disclosure and novelty in patent re-examination: Alza Corporation [2012] APO 70


Like most patent offices, the Australian Patent Office is not well placed to reject patent claims in

examination proceedings for lack of novelty based on inherent disclosure. Of concern are those

claims that contain functional limitations that are not clearly read from a prior art document, and that

require laboratory testing of the prior art to establish whether the relevant limitation is disclosed. So

what opportunity is there to have a patent revoked based on inherent disclosure in post grant reexamination

proceedings where the only information that can be considered is a prior art

document? According to this decision: a significant opportunity!

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Intellectual Property Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Freehills Patent Attorneys | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »