Further Evidence in Australian Patent Office Proceedings: Merial Ltd v Eli Lilly and Company [2-12] APO 69


This is an interesting Australian Patent Office decision insofar as it reveals the deliberations of the

Office in deciding whether to allow a party to patent opposition proceedings to serve further

evidence on another. In what was admittedly a ‘line ball’ decision, it becomes clear how critical it is

for there to be a clear explanation of the significance of evidence, particularly in circumstances

where there is seen to be delay in preparation and service of further evidence.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.