Jennings hopes op-ed leads to bipartisan ACA tweaks... AEI 'Fellow' Stands By Op-Ed Equating Obamacare To Romneycare, Predicts ACA Repeal Unlikely

by InsideHealthPolicy.com
Contact

JD Kleinke, the 20-year health economics veteran and resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute (AEI) who caused a stir with his Sept. 28 New York Times editorial, “The Conservative Case for Obamacare,” tells Inside Health Policy he stands by his view that the health law is built largely on Republican tenets and predicts the law won't be repealed as doing so would leave the insurance industry exposed. While Kleinke believes the final reform law is the most reasonable approach that could have emerged, he admits he dislikes a couple of its “ornaments,' chiefly the Medical Loss Ratio and Independent Payment Advisory Board provisions.

Democratic strategist Chris Jennings says he hopes the op-ed will open the door to eventual bipartisan acceptance and a more collaborative approach to the inevitable fixing of the legislation.

Kleinke tells IHP he has been “shocked” by the amount of animosity and venom of some people's reaction, but stands by the article which equates Obamacare to “Romneycare across state lines.” He characterizes the final reform law as an “elegant hybrid” of a number of public elements, exchanges and mandates that leaves intact what works in the market. It preserves the insurance market, the drug market and does not interfere with the physician-patient relationship, he says.

His op-ed piece sparked strong criticism from conservatives by stating that the “core drivers of the health care act are market principles formulated by conservative economists, designed to correct structural flaws in our health insurance system -- principles originally embraced by Republicans a a market alternative to the Clinton plan in the early 1990s.” He further argues that the law's controversial mandate is “an idea forged not by liberal social engineers at the Brookings Institution but by conservative economists at the Heritage Foundation.” The op-ed continues: “The only thing wrong with the mandate? Mr. Obama also thought it was a good idea.”

Asked about the prospects of an Affordable Care Act repeal, Kleinke tells IHP it would take “a tremendous planetary alignment” for that to happen. The biggest fear for the insurance industry was that the Supreme Court would strike down the individual mandate, keep the other market reforms, such as guarantee issue, and remove the spending caps which would cause the industry to spiral, he says. Kleinke says he can't imagine that Gov. Mitt Romney, if elected, would require the insurers to cover people without a mandate. In his op-ed, he wrote that the health insurance industry has been quietly supporting the law all along because it levels the playing field and expands the potential market by tens of millions of new customers.

Kleinke said that there was no politically motivated timing for the op-ed, which was published days before Wednesday' presidential debate during which health care will take up a 15-minute segment. He says he's been struggling with the issues for decades. He opposed the health care plan put forth by Clinton in the 90s - “too much top down central planning” - and was supportive of ideas presented by people in the Bush administration. When the Obama plan came along, he says, he spent hours and hours reading it and picking it apart, and while there are several things that he was not pleased with, he says he could not imagine how it could have come out any better.

On the strong GOP reaction to the op-ed, he says: “I have never seen the level of acrimony and polemic.It's completely over the top.”

Kleinke concedes that he “put it out there” and is therefore willing to take the hits, but was clearly jarred by the ferocity of the verbal assaults lobbed his way -- mostly by people that he's never met.

In addition to the reactions landing in Kleinke's in-box, several conservative blogs and think tanks -- including a colleague at AEI -- have blasted his argument.

Interestingly, Kleinke says that many of the reactions have come from people on the left, who say that his opinion piece corroborated their belief that the Affordable Care Act is a “give-away” to the insurance industry. If people on the left are as angry as those on the right about the ACA, it basically confirms that this is a “centrist, reasonable” plan, he says.

“I struggled. I wanted not to like it,” he says. However, he said that, at the end of the day, while he disapproved of a few of the “ornaments” on the bill, it was the most reasonable approach.

Kleinke also downplays the push-back from many of the right who say that they don't want the health exchanges to be managed by the government. “It's a trivial distinction,” he says . The are people on the far right who just don't like the concept of government being involved at all, they have an ideological knee-jerk reaction.

One of the provisions that he does not like is the Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) provision which he says 'restricts” industry profits and is populist and ridiculous. The rule is “crude” and does not take into account the nature of the industry in which profit rises and falls on a yearly basis, he says. “It is a dangerous, onerous, populist provision that is killing innovation in health insurance and scaring away capital investment,” he adds.

He is also opposed to the independent Payment Advisory Board (IPAB). And, he also believes that many of the public health provisions should have been addressed in separate legislation.

Jennings tells IHP he hopes Kleinke's piece will open the door to bipartisan efforts to tweak the law. He says he found Kleinke's argument “very impressive” and says that if president is reelected the piece could really become the long-term view that becomes more accepted. That would open the door to an honest conversation on about how to reform the reforms, he suggested. Historically, that has been the case, he said, noting that Medicare and even Part D were partisan bills that became more bipartisan over time. “That's what I hope for.”

Additionally, he says, the op-ed piece could open the door to other internal discussions about deficit reduction.

Jennings agrees with Kleinke's characterization of the bill as one grounded on GOP principles. If you told me that there had been a health care debate and the final outcome was a state-based exchange that relied upon private insurers, I would have thought it was a GOP policy -- or at least a very, very bipartisan agreement, he says.

In 2009, Jennings worked with Mark McClellan -- CMS administrator under Bush -- to help develop a health reform plan for the Bipartisan Policy Center -- which was backed by former Senate Majority Leaders Tom Daschle (D-SD), Bob Dole (R-KS) and Howard Baker (R-TN). The plan that emerged was very similar to the one that was enacted, Jennings says.

In fact, Jennings says that he couldn't imagine a more conservative approach that would have satisfied the same coverage goals. -- Amy Lotven ( alotven@iwpnews.com This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it )

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© InsideHealthPolicy.com | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

InsideHealthPolicy.com
Contact
more
less

InsideHealthPolicy.com on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
Feedback? Tell us what you think of the new jdsupra.com!