Jones Act Battles, Administrative Appointees on the Move, and Combative Hearings Shape the Landscape

by Cozen O'Connor
Contact

Cozen O'Connor

This edition of the Cozen O’Connor Maritime and Infrastructure Federal Update discusses (i) the Jones Act conflict developing before Customs and Border Protection with respect to the use of foreign flag vessels to perform work on the U.S. Outer Continental Shelf, (ii) the implementation of a significant terminal coordination agreement, (iii) leadership changes at the Department of Transportation and Federal Maritime Commission, (iv) settlement of a landmark Jones Act case, (v) House actions regarding Metropolitan Planning Organizations and the Coast Guard and (vi) Congressional hearings on Coast Guard, maritime, and infrastructure programs.

Regulatory and Administrative

Tensions Rise over CBP’s Vessel Equipment Letter Rulings

As reported last month, on January 18, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) published a proposal to modify or revoke more than 20 ruling letters to clarify the intersection of “merchandise” and “vessel equipment” under the Jones Act, as informed by Treasury Decision 49815(4). The proposed modification would limit “vessel equipment” to “portable articles necessary and appropriate for the navigation, operation, or maintenance of the vessel and for the comfort and safety of the persons on board,” extending Jones Act coastwise trade requirements to many previously excluded items, including repair materials, pipeline connectors, and damaged pipe removed from the seabed.

CBP extended the public comment deadline to April 18, with the possibility of further extensions. Advocates for both sides have been extremely vocal, with the American Maritime Partnership (AMP), Shipbuilders Council of America (SCA), and Offshore Marine Service Association (OMSA) praising CBP and asserting that the proposal would restore more than 3,200 jobs to the offshore market. AMP, SCA, and OMSA have been joined by 33 members of the House of Representatives and 10 Senators, who have submitted letters of support to CBP. In opposition, members of the oil and gas industry have asserted that the proposal would lead to a decrease in spending on oil and natural gas development in the Gulf of Mexico in the range of $5.4 billion per year, with a resulting loss of 80,000 jobs through 2030, due to the inability to use foreign flag subsea construction, reel lay, and heavy lift vessels in the development of U.S. offshore oil and natural gas projects.

Port Coordination Agreement Goes into Effect

The Federal Maritime Commission (FMC) voted to allow the East Coast Gateway Terminal Agreement between the port authorities of Georgia and Virginia to go into effect. Under the agreement, which became effective on April 10, the port authorities may discuss and exchange information on marketing materials, commercial opportunities (including operational efficiencies and cost reductions), joint or independent acquisition and utilization of operating systems and equipment, and cargo handling terms and practices. In addition, the agreement allows the port authorities to act as a single entity in the exchange of information and performance criteria with carriers, shippers, and marine terminal operators; however, the agreement does not allow the port authorities to jointly negotiate, set, and approve terminal rates or charges.

Key DOT Nominations and Appointments

On April 6, President Trump nominated Derek Kan to serve as the Department of Transportation’s (DOT) undersecretary for policy. Kan currently is a general manager for the ridesharing company Lyft and is a member of Amtrak’s board of directors. He previously worked as an aide to Senator Mitch McConnell and as chief economist for the Senate Republican Policy Committee.

Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao selected Marty Fiorentino to serve as her senior adviser on ports. Fiorentino has worked with CSX Corporation, the Seaboard System Railroad, and the Jacksonville Port Authority. He has also served as chief of staff for the Federal Railroad Administration and as counselor to the deputy secretary of Transportation during the George H.W. Bush administration. Fiorentino is the president of the Fiorentino Group, a Florida-based government affairs firm specializing in maritime and infrastructure issues.

Cordero to Depart the FMC

Former Federal Maritime Commission chairman and current commissioner, Mario Cordero, will be departing the FMC on May 12, after Port of Long Beach Board of Harbor Commissioners selected Commissioner Cordero as the port’s new executive director. Commissioner Cordero served as the FMC’s chairman from April 2013 until January 2017, when he was replaced under the new administration by Acting Chairman Michael Khouri.

Senate Commerce Committee Advances Nominee for Deputy DOT Secretary

The Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation voted 15-12 along party lines to approve Jeffrey Rosen’s nomination for deputy secretary of Transportation. Opposition to Rosen’s nomination questioned his commitment to safety regulations and the extent to which Rosen would recuse himself from matters related to previous transportation industry clients. His nomination awaits consideration by the full Senate.

Furie and DHS Settle Jones Act Dispute

As previously reported, on March 24, Furie Operating Alaska, LLC and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) jointly filed a Stipulation of Dismissal in the U.S. District Court for the District of Alaska, ending their long-standing Jones Act dispute. The dispute arose out of Furie’s transportation of a jack-up rig from the Gulf of Mexico to Cook Inlet, Alaska, in March 2011. A portion of the transportation was performed by a foreign-flag, heavy-lift vessel instead of a coastwise-qualified U.S.-flag vessel. Prior to the move, Furie had not received a DHS-issued Jones Act waiver. DHS, acting through Customs and Border Protection, assessed a $15 million penalty against Furie, prompting Furie to file suit. Details of the settlement have not been released.

Legislative

House Committee Approves Metropolitan Planning Organization, Coast Guard Bills

On March 29, the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee approved Representative Daniel Lipinski’s (D-Ill.) H.R. 1346 by voice vote. The bill would repeal a 2016 Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration rule that requires Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) in the same urban area to adjust their boundaries, merge, or otherwise develop a single metropolitan transportation plan and joint performance targets. The Senate passed a companion bill, S. 496, by unanimous consent in early March.

During the same markup session, the committee approved Representative Duncan Hunter’s (R-Calif.) bill, H.R. 1726, to reorganize portions of Title 14 of the U.S. Code related to the Coast Guard. The bill’s provisions may assist in moving the Coast Guard to the Department of Defense, which Rep. Hunter urged in his March 16 letter to the president and repeated during recent hearings.

House Subcommittee Holds Maritime Program Reauthorization Hearing

The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure’s Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation held a reauthorization hearing on April 4 that brought together officials from the Coast Guard, the Federal Maritime Commission, and the Maritime Administration (MARAD).

Full committee Ranking Member Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.), backed up by subcommittee Chairman Duncan Hunter (R-Calif.), engaged in a heated debate with FMC Acting Chairman Michael Khouri regarding the FMC’s oversight of the Shipping Act’s antitrust immunities. Rep. DeFazio suggested that Congress “re-address” the antitrust immunity that has been granted under the Shipping Act.

The panel additionally discussed potential solutions to address perceived shortfalls in the government’s sealift capabilities. MARAD Executive Director Joel Szabat suggested expanding the Maritime Security (MSP) or creating a MSP-like program to address shortfalls in available vessels and, in particular, mariners, to meet U.S Transportation Command requirements. He also suggested implementing trade policies that increase the use of U.S.-flag vessels to address the mariner shortage. This initiative is supported by Representative John Garamendi (D-Calif.), as evidenced by his bill, H.R. 1240, that would require the use of U.S.-flag vessels to carry a percentage of LNG and crude oil exports.

Transportation Committee Discusses FAST Act Implementation

The House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure’s Subcommittee on Highways and Transit held a hearing on state and local perspectives on implementing the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act on April 5. The FAST Act, signed into law in December 2015, authorizes $305 billion in transportation infrastructure investment through fiscal year 2020.

During the hearing, Republican committee members advocated for overhauling the permitting process for infrastructure construction projects. Democrats such as committee Ranking Member Peter DeFazio (D-Ore.) disagreed, arguing that permitting regulations only slow down work on a small number of projects; they instead advocated for focusing on infrastructure funding. Rep. DeFazio further criticized Secretary of Transportation Elaine Chao for using “alternative facts” in her recent claim that federal regulations are the largest barrier to infrastructure improvement projects.

 

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Cozen O'Connor | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

Cozen O'Connor
Contact
more
less

Cozen O'Connor on:

Readers' Choice 2017
Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up using*

Already signed up? Log in here

*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
Privacy Policy (Updated: October 8, 2015):
hide

JD Supra provides users with access to its legal industry publishing services (the "Service") through its website (the "Website") as well as through other sources. Our policies with regard to data collection and use of personal information of users of the Service, regardless of the manner in which users access the Service, and visitors to the Website are set forth in this statement ("Policy"). By using the Service, you signify your acceptance of this Policy.

Information Collection and Use by JD Supra

JD Supra collects users' names, companies, titles, e-mail address and industry. JD Supra also tracks the pages that users visit, logs IP addresses and aggregates non-personally identifiable user data and browser type. This data is gathered using cookies and other technologies.

The information and data collected is used to authenticate users and to send notifications relating to the Service, including email alerts to which users have subscribed; to manage the Service and Website, to improve the Service and to customize the user's experience. This information is also provided to the authors of the content to give them insight into their readership and help them to improve their content, so that it is most useful for our users.

JD Supra does not sell, rent or otherwise provide your details to third parties, other than to the authors of the content on JD Supra.

If you prefer not to enable cookies, you may change your browser settings to disable cookies; however, please note that rejecting cookies while visiting the Website may result in certain parts of the Website not operating correctly or as efficiently as if cookies were allowed.

Email Choice/Opt-out

Users who opt in to receive emails may choose to no longer receive e-mail updates and newsletters by selecting the "opt-out of future email" option in the email they receive from JD Supra or in their JD Supra account management screen.

Security

JD Supra takes reasonable precautions to insure that user information is kept private. We restrict access to user information to those individuals who reasonably need access to perform their job functions, such as our third party email service, customer service personnel and technical staff. However, please note that no method of transmitting or storing data is completely secure and we cannot guarantee the security of user information. Unauthorized entry or use, hardware or software failure, and other factors may compromise the security of user information at any time.

If you have reason to believe that your interaction with us is no longer secure, you must immediately notify us of the problem by contacting us at info@jdsupra.com. In the unlikely event that we believe that the security of your user information in our possession or control may have been compromised, we may seek to notify you of that development and, if so, will endeavor to do so as promptly as practicable under the circumstances.

Sharing and Disclosure of Information JD Supra Collects

Except as otherwise described in this privacy statement, JD Supra will not disclose personal information to any third party unless we believe that disclosure is necessary to: (1) comply with applicable laws; (2) respond to governmental inquiries or requests; (3) comply with valid legal process; (4) protect the rights, privacy, safety or property of JD Supra, users of the Service, Website visitors or the public; (5) permit us to pursue available remedies or limit the damages that we may sustain; and (6) enforce our Terms & Conditions of Use.

In the event there is a change in the corporate structure of JD Supra such as, but not limited to, merger, consolidation, sale, liquidation or transfer of substantial assets, JD Supra may, in its sole discretion, transfer, sell or assign information collected on and through the Service to one or more affiliated or unaffiliated third parties.

Links to Other Websites

This Website and the Service may contain links to other websites. The operator of such other websites may collect information about you, including through cookies or other technologies. If you are using the Service through the Website and link to another site, you will leave the Website and this Policy will not apply to your use of and activity on those other sites. We encourage you to read the legal notices posted on those sites, including their privacy policies. We shall have no responsibility or liability for your visitation to, and the data collection and use practices of, such other sites. This Policy applies solely to the information collected in connection with your use of this Website and does not apply to any practices conducted offline or in connection with any other websites.

Changes in Our Privacy Policy

We reserve the right to change this Policy at any time. Please refer to the date at the top of this page to determine when this Policy was last revised. Any changes to our privacy policy will become effective upon posting of the revised policy on the Website. By continuing to use the Service or Website following such changes, you will be deemed to have agreed to such changes. If you do not agree with the terms of this Policy, as it may be amended from time to time, in whole or part, please do not continue using the Service or the Website.

Contacting JD Supra

If you have any questions about this privacy statement, the practices of this site, your dealings with this Web site, or if you would like to change any of the information you have provided to us, please contact us at: info@jdsupra.com.

- hide
*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.