Judge Issues Preliminary Injunction Barring UnitedHealthcare from Terminating Certain Physicians From Medicare Advantage Plans


The United States District Court for the District of Connecticut recently granted Fairfield County Medical Association’s and Hartford County Medical Association’s (collectively, the “Associations”) motion for a preliminary injunction seeking to bar UnitedHealthcare (“United”) from terminating approximately 2,200 physicians from United’s Medicare Advantage program.

In October 2013, United issued termination letters to more than 2,000 Connecticut physicians notifying them that they would be removed from United’s Medicare Advantage Network, effective February 1, 2014.  United characterized this decision as an “amendment” to each provider contract.  The amendment clauses in the physician contracts allow United broad discretion to unilaterally alter its agreements with physicians.  The Associations filed suit on behalf of their physician members, arguing that United’s action was a termination, and that United had denied the physicians’ substantive and procedural due process rights under the Medicare Act and had breached the individual contracts with each affected physician.

The court found that the Associations would suffer irreparable harm if a preliminary injunction were not granted, specifically:  (1) disruption of physician relationships with their Medicare Advantage patients; (2) loss of goodwill and reputational harm, and (3) a resulting loss of ability to compete in the market for the provision of Medicare services, particularly because United is the largest Medicare insurance issuer in Connecticut.  The court also found the Associations demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims.  Based on these findings, the court preliminarily enjoined United from (1) terminating any of the Associations’ affected physicians from United’s Medicare Advantage network; (2) notifying Medicare Advantage customers that certain providers will be terminated; and (3) removing or failing to advertise the Associations’ affected physicians in United’s 2014 directories for the Medicare Advantage Network.  The preliminary injunction is to remain in effect until a ruling on the merits of the Associations’ claims or until further order of the court.

On December 12, 2013, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals refused to issue an interim stay of the preliminary injunction and referred United’s request for an emergency stay to a three-judge panel.  The case is Fairfield County Medical Association, et al. v. UnitedHealthcare of New England, et al, No. 3:13-cv-1621, and its resolution has potential implications nationwide as other health plans take steps to terminate physicians from their Medicare Advantage networks.  The order granting the Associations’ preliminary injunction is available here

Reporter, Jennifer S. Lewin, Atlanta, +1 404 572 3569, jlewin@kslaw.com.

Written by:

Published In:

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© King & Spalding | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »

All the intelligence you need, in one easy email:

Great! Your first step to building an email digest of JD Supra authors and topics. Log in with LinkedIn so we can start sending your digest...

Sign up for your custom alerts now, using LinkedIn ›

* With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name.