Judicial Elections and Medical Malpractice

Once they understand what "tort reform" tries to do to victims of medical malpractice, most fairminded people agree it's just not fair to put artificial legislative limits on the amount of money a patient can recover in a lawsuit. Such limits hurt the most devastated victims: People with spinal cord injuries, brain injuries and similar catastrophic harm are the ones who typically qualify for multi-million dollar damages to set their lives back on track. In the few cases when juries are more generous than the facts warrant -- an occurrence that is statistically rare -- the trial judge and the appeals court judges have the power to roll back the number to something reasonable.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Civil Remedies Updates, Elections & Politics Updates, Professional Malpractice Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Patrick Malone & Associates P.C. | DC Injury Lawyers | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »


About Patrick Malone: Patrick Malone is a leading patient safety advocate and attorney who... View Profile »

Follow Patrick Malone & Associates P.C. | DC Injury Lawyers:

Reporters on Deadline