Judicial Restraint in the Early Days Following Stern v. Marshall

more+
less-

Over five months have passed since the United States Supreme Court entered its landmark decision of Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011) [2011 BL 165774] the Court’s first key ruling in decades on bankruptcy court jurisdiction. In Stern, the Court ruled, in a 5-4 decision, that a bankruptcy court “lacked the constitutional authority to enter a final judgment on a state law counterclaim that is not resolved in the process of ruling on a creditor’s proof of claim.”

As of the date of this article, over 100 bankruptcy court cases across all circuits have cited to Stern, many grappling with their ability to issue final judgment in cases ranging from proceedings for relief from the automatic stay to fraudulent transfer proceedings. Courts struggle with the implications of the Stern decision, and will continue to do so while the courts of appeal begin to provide needed clarity on the various questions Stern raises.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.


DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Written by:

more+
less-

Morrison & Foerster LLP on:

Reporters on Deadline

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:

Sign up to create your digest using LinkedIn*

*With LinkedIn, you don't need to create a separate login to manage your free JD Supra account, and we can make suggestions based on your needs and interests. We will not post anything on LinkedIn in your name. Or, sign up using your email address.
×
Loading...
×
×