Judicial Restraint in the Early Days Following Stern v. Marshall

more+
less-

Over five months have passed since the United States Supreme Court entered its landmark decision of Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011) [2011 BL 165774] the Court’s first key ruling in decades on bankruptcy court jurisdiction. In Stern, the Court ruled, in a 5-4 decision, that a bankruptcy court “lacked the constitutional authority to enter a final judgment on a state law counterclaim that is not resolved in the process of ruling on a creditor’s proof of claim.”

As of the date of this article, over 100 bankruptcy court cases across all circuits have cited to Stern, many grappling with their ability to issue final judgment in cases ranging from proceedings for relief from the automatic stay to fraudulent transfer proceedings. Courts struggle with the implications of the Stern decision, and will continue to do so while the courts of appeal begin to provide needed clarity on the various questions Stern raises.

Please see full article below for more information.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Published In: Bankruptcy Updates, Civil Procedure Updates, Constitutional Law Updates, Wills, Trusts, & Estate Planning Updates

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »