Kappos v Hyatt

Kappos v Hyatt

more+
less-

There are no limitations on a patent applicant’s ability to introduce new evidence in a §145 proceeding beyond those already presentin the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. If new evidence is presented on a disputed question of fact,the district court must make de novo factual findings that take account of both the new evidence and the administrative record before the PTO.

LOADING PDF: If there are any problems, click here to download the file.

Topics:  Administrative Procedure Act, Evidence, Hyatt, Kappos, Patents, USPTO

Published In: Intellectual Property Updates

Reference Info:Decision | Federal, U.S. Supreme Court | United States

DISCLAIMER: Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Bryan Beel | Attorney Advertising

Don't miss a thing! Build a custom news brief:

Read fresh new writing on compliance, cybersecurity, Dodd-Frank, whistleblowers, social media, hiring & firing, patent reform, the NLRB, Obamacare, the SEC…

…or whatever matters the most to you. Follow authors, firms, and topics on JD Supra.

Create your news brief now - it's free and easy »